Switch to: References

Add citations

You must login to add citations.
  1. Russell’s Concepts "Name", "Existence" and "Unique Object of Reference" in Light of Modern Physics.Paul Weingartner - 2007 - Russell: The Journal of Bertrand Russell Studies 27 (1):125-143.
    Abstract:With his theory of descriptions Russell wanted to solve two problems concerning denotation and reference, which are formulated here as Problem I and Problem II. After presenting each problem, we describe the main points of Russell’s solution. We deal with Russell’s concepts of existence and then elaborate his presuppositions concerning the relation of denoting and referring. Next we discuss the presuppositions or principles which underlie Russell’s understanding of the objects of reference. These principles are such that if the objects of (...)
    Direct download (4 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark  
  • Fregean Description Theory in Proof-Theoretical Setting.Andrzej Indrzejczak - forthcoming - Logic and Logical Philosophy:1.
  • Existential instantiation and normalization in sequent natural deduction.Carlo Cellucci - 1992 - Annals of Pure and Applied Logic 58 (2):111-148.
    ellucci, C., Existential instantiation and normalization in sequent natural deduction, Annals of Pure and Applied Logic 58 111–148. A sequent conclusion natural deduction system is introduced in which classical logic is treated per se, not as a special case of intuitionistic logic. The system includes an existential instantiation rule and involves restrictions on the discharge rules. Contrary to the standard formula conclusion natural deduction systems for classical logic, its normal derivations satisfy both the subformula property and the separation property and (...)
    Direct download (3 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   7 citations  
  • A New Look at Definite Descriptions.Mario Bunge - 1971 - Kagaku Tetsugaku 4:131-146.
  • Is Classical Mathematics Appropriate for Theory of Computation?Farzad Didehvar - manuscript
    Throughout this paper, we are trying to show how and why our Mathematical frame-work seems inappropriate to solve problems in Theory of Computation. More exactly, the concept of turning back in time in paradoxes causes inconsistency in modeling of the concept of Time in some semantic situations. As we see in the first chapter, by introducing a version of “Unexpected Hanging Paradox”,first we attempt to open a new explanation for some paradoxes. In the second step, by applying this paradox, it (...)
    Direct download (4 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   1 citation