- Argumentative approach to "framing": framing, deliberation and action in an environmental conflict.Isabela Fairclough & Irina Diana Madroane - 2020 - Co-herencia 17 (32):119-158.details
|
|
Probabilities, Causes and Propensities in Physics.Mauricio Suárez - 2010 - In Mauricio Suárez (ed.), Probabilities, Causes and Propensities in Physics. New York: Springer.details
|
|
"Conductive" argumentation in the UK fracking debate.Isabela Fairclough - 2017 - In Fairclough Isabela (ed.), Studies in Logic and Argumentation. College Publications.details
|
|
Book Review: Catton, P., & Macdonald, G. (Eds.). (2004). Karl Popper: Critical appraisals. London: Routledge. Pp. xii + 235. [REVIEW]Gunnar Andersson - 2009 - Philosophy of the Social Sciences 39 (1):115-119.details
|
|
Book Review: Catton, P., & Macdonald, G. (Eds.). (2004). Karl Popper: Critical appraisals. London: Routledge. Pp. xii + 235. [REVIEW]Gunnar Andersson - 2009 - Philosophy of the Social Sciences 39 (1):115-119.details
|
|
The Burden of Criticism: Consequences of Taking a Critical Stance.Jan Albert van Laar & Erik C. W. Krabbe - 2013 - Argumentation 27 (2):201-224.details
|
|
The Claims of Generalized Darwinism.Rod Thomas - 2018 - Philosophy of Management 17 (2):149-167.details
|
|
Why the Objectivist Interpretation of Falsification Matters.Miloš Taliga - 2016 - Philosophy of the Social Sciences 46 (4):335-351.details
|
|
Rationality, Reasonableness, and Critical Rationalism: Problems with the Pragma-dialectical View. [REVIEW]Harvey Siegel & John Biro - 2008 - Argumentation 22 (2):191-203.details
|
|
A new criterion for confounder selection? Neither a confounder nor science.Eyal Shahar - 2013 - Journal of Evaluation in Clinical Practice 19 (5):984-986.details
|
|
Re-enchanting Realism in Debate with Kyle Stanford.Emma Ruttkamp-Bloem - 2013 - Journal for General Philosophy of Science / Zeitschrift für Allgemeine Wissenschaftstheorie 44 (1):201-224.details
|
|
A Philosophical Analysis of the General Methodology of Qualitative Research: A Critical Rationalist Perspective. [REVIEW]Abraham Rudnick - 2014 - Health Care Analysis 22 (3):1-10.details
|
|
The empirical stance vs. the critical attitude.Darrell Patrick Rowbottom - 2005 - South African Journal of Philosophy 24 (3):200-223.details
|
|
The big test of corroboration.Darrell Patrick Rowbottom - 2008 - International Studies in the Philosophy of Science 22 (3):293 – 302.details
|
|
Scientific progress without increasing verisimilitude: In response to Niiniluoto.Darrell Patrick Rowbottom - 2015 - Studies in History and Philosophy of Science Part A 51:100-104.details
|
|
No dilemma for pancritical rationalism: In response to Hauptli.Darrell Patrick Rowbottom - 2009 - Philosophy of the Social Sciences 39 (3):490-494.details
|
|
No Dilemma for Pancritical Rationalism: In Response to Hauptli.Darrell Patrick Rowbottom - 2009 - Philosophy of the Social Sciences 39 (3):490-494.details
|
|
Evolutionary Epistemology and the Aim of Science.Darrell Patrick Rowbottom - 2010 - Australasian Journal of Philosophy 88 (2):209-225.details
|
|
Skepticism, the critical standpoint, and the origin of birds: a partial critique of Havstad and Smith (2019).John A. Pourtless Iv - 2022 - Biology and Philosophy 37 (6):1–19.details
|
|
A Critical Assessment of the Programmes of Producing ‘Islamic Science’ and ‘Islamisation of Science/Knowledge’.Ali Paya - 2015 - International Studies in the Philosophy of Science 29 (3):311-335.details
|
|
The Devaluation of the Subject in Popper’s Theory of World 3.Zuzana Parusniková - 2016 - Philosophy of the Social Sciences 46 (3):304-317.details
|
|
Truth, rationality, and the situation.Mark A. Notturno - 1998 - Philosophy of the Social Sciences 28 (3):400-421.details
|
|
Verisimilitude: a causal approach.Robert Northcott - 2013 - Synthese 190 (9):1471-1488.details
|
|
Survey article. Verisimilitude: the third period.Ilkka Niiniluoto - 1998 - British Journal for the Philosophy of Science 49 (1):1-29.details
|
|
Truthlikeness: old and new debates.Ilkka Niiniluoto - 1990 - Synthese 84 (1):139-152.details
|
|
Truthlikeness: old and new debates.Ilkka Niiniluoto - 2020 - Synthese 197 (4):1581-1599.details
|
|
Critical Rationalism: An Epistemological Critique.Masoud Mohammadi Alamuti - 2023 - Foundations of Science 28 (3):809-840.details
|
|
El sustrato ideológico y político de la crítica de Mises al Monismo Metodológico.Gustavo Marqués - 2006 - Endoxa 1 (21):347.details
|
|
A Refined Propensity Account for GRW Theory.Lorenzo Lorenzetti - 2021 - Foundations of Physics 51 (2):1-20.details
|
|
The Burden of Criticism: Consequences of Taking a Critical Stance.Jan Albert Laar & Erik C. W. Krabbe - 2013 - Argumentation 27 (2):201-224.details
|
|
Openness to the unknown: The role of falsifiability in search of better knowledge.Yasuyuki Kageyama - 2003 - Philosophy of the Social Sciences 33 (1):100-121.details
|
|
Pornography Stumps Analytic Philosophers of Art.Ian Jarvie - 2015 - Philosophy of the Social Sciences 45 (1):122-140.details
|
|
Is analytic philosophy the cure for film theory?Ian Jarvie - 1999 - Philosophy of the Social Sciences 29 (3):416-440.details
|
|
Some considerations on conditional chances.Paul Humphreys - 2004 - British Journal for the Philosophy of Science 55 (4):667-680.details
|
|
Reviving Frequentism.Mario Hubert - 2021 - Synthese 199:5255–5584.details
|
|
The reference class problem is your problem too.Alan Hájek - 2007 - Synthese 156 (3):563--585.details
|
|
Falsification of Propensity Models by Statistical Tests and the Goodness-of-Fit Paradox.Christian Hennig - 2007 - Philosophia Mathematica 15 (2):166-192.details
|
|
A Normative Theory of Argument Strength.Ulrike Hahn & Mike Oaksford - 2006 - Informal Logic 26 (1):1-24.details
|
|
The Ethical Nature of Karl Popper’s Solution to the Problem of Rationality.Stefano Gattei - 2002 - Philosophy of the Social Sciences 32 (2):240-266.details
|
|
Favoring, Likelihoodism, and Bayesianism. [REVIEW]Branden Fitelson - 2011 - Philosophy and Phenomenological Research 83 (3):666-672.details
|
|
Another Look at the Modal Collapse Argument.Omar Fakhri - 2021 - European Journal for Philosophy of Religion 13 (1):1-23.details
|
|
Evaluating policy as argument: the public debate over the first UK austerity budget.Isabela Fairclough - 2016 - Critical Discourse Studies 13 (1):57-77.details
|
|
On Critical and Pancritical Rationalism.Antoni Diller - 2013 - Philosophy of the Social Sciences 43 (2):127-156.details
|
|
Can free evidence be bad? Value of informationfor the imprecise probabilist.Seamus Bradley & Katie Steele - 2016 - Philosophy of Science 83 (1):1-28.details
|
|
The Propensity Interpretation of Probability: A Re-evaluation.Joseph Berkovitz - 2015 - Erkenntnis 80 (S3):629-711.details
|
|
On Probabilities in Biology and Physics.Joseph Berkovitz & Philippe Huneman - 2015 - Erkenntnis 80 (S3):433-456.details
|
|
Propensities and probabilities.Nuel Belnap - 2007 - Studies in History and Philosophy of Science Part B: Studies in History and Philosophy of Modern Physics 38 (3):593-625.details
|
|
Probability and Manipulation: Evolution and Simulation in Applied Population Genetics.Marshall Abrams - 2015 - Erkenntnis 80 (S3):519-549.details
|
|
Entropy - A Guide for the Perplexed.Roman Frigg & Charlotte Werndl - 2011 - In Claus Beisbart & Stephan Hartmann (eds.), Probabilities in Physics. Oxford University Press. pp. 115-142.details
|
|
A dialectical profile for the evaluation of practical arguments.Isabela Fairclough - unknowndetails
|
|