Switch to: References

Citations of:

Ricoeur et ses contemporains: Bourdieu, Derrida, Deleuze, Foucault, Castoriadis

Paris: Presses universitaires de France (2013)

Add citations

You must login to add citations.
  1. Social Imaginaries in Debate.John Krummel, Suzi Adams, Jeremy Smith, Natalie Doyle & Paul Blokker - 2015 - Social Imaginaries 1 (1):15-52.
    A collaborative article by the Editorial Collective of Social Imaginaries. Investigations into social imaginaries have burgeoned in recent years. From ‘the capitalist imaginary’ to the ‘democratic imaginary’, from the ‘ecological imaginary’ to ‘the global imaginary’ – and beyond – the social imaginaries field has expanded across disciplines and beyond the academy. The recent debates on social imaginaries and potential new imaginaries reveal a recognisable field and paradigm-in-the-making. We argue that Castoriadis, Ricoeur, and Taylor have articulated the most important theoretical frameworks (...)
    Direct download (3 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   9 citations  
  • Un posible acercamiento entre Ricoeur y Foucault: hermenéutica y prácticas del sí.María Beatriz Delpech - 2018 - Revista de Humanidades de Valparaíso 11:93-113.
    It is no coincidence that the relationship between Paul Ricoeur and Michel Foucault has been principally discussed in research carried out by specialists in one of these two thinkers. Although active at the same time, the scholar can easily get the impression that they worked in two parallel philosophical universes. This paper will argue, however, that a comparative reading is nonetheless possible. Taking identity and the subject as key areas of discussion, as well as the methodology used to deal with (...)
    No categories
    Direct download (2 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark  
  • A Potential Approach between Ricoeur and Foucault: Hermeneutics and Technics of the Self.María Beatriz Delpech - 2018 - Humanities Journal of Valparaiso 11:93-113.
    It is no coincidence that the relationship between Paul Ricoeur and Michel Foucault has been principally discussed in research carried out by specialists in one of these two thinkers. Although active at the same time, the scholar can easily get the impression that they worked in two parallel philosophical universes. This paper will argue, however, that a comparative reading is nonetheless possible. Taking identity and the subject as key areas of discussion, as well as the methodology used to deal with (...)
    No categories
    Direct download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark  
  • La fidélité des hérétiques. Ricœur et Patočka sur les Méditations cartésiennes de Husserl.Luz Ascarate - 2017 - Meta: Research in Hermeneutics, Phenomenology, and Practical Philosophy 9 (2):416-436.
    In spite of making explicit their phenomenological influence, Ricœur and Patočka have been very critical with husserlian idealism. In that sense, although we can consider those remarks as “heresies” to Husserl’s thought, they evidence their belonging to the phenomenological tradition. Following this trail, in this article, we ask the question: How to characterize the phenomenological conceptions of Ricœur and Patočka despite of their common critique of husserlian idealism? To answer this question, we analyze their respective commentaries to Husserl’s Cartesians Meditations. (...)
    Direct download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark  
  • Michel, J., Ricœur et ses contemporains.Ugo Gilbert Tremblay - 2013 - Ithaque 13:227-231.
    No categories
    Direct download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark