Switch to: References

Add citations

You must login to add citations.
  1. Δ1 Ultrapowers are totally rigid.T. G. McLaughlin - 2007 - Archive for Mathematical Logic 46 (5-6):379-384.
    Hirschfeld and Wheeler proved in 1975 that ∑1 ultrapowers (= “simple models”) are rigid; i.e., they admit no non-trivial automorphisms. We later noted, essentially mimicking their technique, that the same is true of Δ1 ultrapowers (= “Nerode semirings”), a class of models of Π2 Arithmetic that overlaps, but is mutually non-inclusive with, the class of Σ1 ultrapowers. Hirschfeld and Wheeler left as open the question whether some Σ1 ultrapowers might admit proper isomorphic self-injections. We do not answer that question; but (...)
    Direct download (4 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark  
  • Sub-arithmetical ultrapowers: a survey.Thomas G. McLaughlin - 1990 - Annals of Pure and Applied Logic 49 (2):143-191.
  • Recursive ultrapowers, simple models, and cofinal extensions.T. G. McLaughlin - 1992 - Archive for Mathematical Logic 31 (4):287-296.
  • Eight problems about nerode semirings.T. G. McLaughlin - 1992 - Annals of Pure and Applied Logic 56 (1-3):137-146.
    Several problems that pertain to certain arithmetically well-behaved countable subsemirings of Λ, the semiring of isols, are discussed. This is relevant to the present volume memorializing the late John Myhill, in that Myhill was an early co-developer of the theory of Λ.
    Direct download (4 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark