Switch to: References

Add citations

You must login to add citations.
  1. Rejecting published work: It couldn't happen in physics! (or could it?).Michael J. Moravcsik - 1982 - Behavioral and Brain Sciences 5 (2):228-229.
  • Peer review and the Current Anthropology experience.Cyril Belshaw - 1982 - Behavioral and Brain Sciences 5 (2):200-201.
  • Peer-review practices of psychological journals: The fate of published articles, submitted again.Douglas P. Peters & Stephen J. Ceci - 1982 - Behavioral and Brain Sciences 5 (2):187-255.
    A growing interest in and concern about the adequacy and fairness of modern peer-review practices in publication and funding are apparent across a wide range of scientific disciplines. Although questions about reliability, accountability, reviewer bias, and competence have been raised, there has been very little direct research on these variables.The present investigation was an attempt to study the peer-review process directly, in the natural setting of actual journal referee evaluations of submitted manuscripts. As test materials we selected 12 already published (...)
    Direct download (6 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   76 citations  
  • Aesthetic Creativity: Insights from classical literary theory on creative learning.Tomas Georg Hellström - 2011 - Educational Philosophy and Theory 43 (4):321-335.
    This paper addresses the subject of textual creativity by drawing on work done in classical literary theory and criticism, specifically new criticism, structuralism and early poststructuralism. The question of how readers and writers engage creatively with the text is closely related to educational concerns, though they are often thought of as separate disciplines. Modern literary theory in many ways collapses this distinction in its concern for how literariness is achieved and, specifically, how ‘literary quality’ is accomplished in the textual and (...)
    Direct download (4 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   1 citation  
  • Bias, incompetence, or bad management?John Ziman - 1982 - Behavioral and Brain Sciences 5 (2):245-246.
  • Reliability and validity of peer review.David Zeaman - 1982 - Behavioral and Brain Sciences 5 (2):245-245.
  • Competency testing for reviewers and editors.Rosalyn S. Yalow - 1982 - Behavioral and Brain Sciences 5 (2):244-245.
  • Experimenter and reviewer bias.Joseph C. Witt & Michael J. Hannafin - 1982 - Behavioral and Brain Sciences 5 (2):243-244.
  • Research on peer-review practices: Problems of interpretation, application, and propriety.William A. Wilson - 1982 - Behavioral and Brain Sciences 5 (2):242-243.
  • The quandary of manuscript reviewing.Grover J. Whitehurst - 1982 - Behavioral and Brain Sciences 5 (2):241-242.
  • Some procedural obscurities in Peters and Ceci's peer-review study.Murray J. White - 1982 - Behavioral and Brain Sciences 5 (2):241-241.
  • Perhaps it was right to reject the resubmitted manuscripts.Garth J. Thomas - 1982 - Behavioral and Brain Sciences 5 (2):240-240.
  • Responsibility in reviewing and research.Sol Tax & Robert A. Rubinstein - 1982 - Behavioral and Brain Sciences 5 (2):238-240.
  • Anthropology’s Disenchantment With the Cognitive Revolution1.Richard A. Shweder - 2012 - Topics in Cognitive Science 4 (3):354-361.
    Beller, Bender, and Medin should be congratulated for their generous attempt at expressive academic therapy for troubled interdisciplinary relationships. In this essay, I suggest that a negative answer to the central question (“Should anthropology be part of cognitive science?”) is not necessarily distressing, that in retrospect the breakup seems fairly predictable, and that disenchantment with the cognitive revolution is nothing new.
    Direct download (2 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   2 citations  
  • Spiritual Work, Memory Work: Revival and Recollection at Salem Camp Meeting.Bradd Shore - 2008 - Ethos: Journal of the Society for Psychological Anthropology 36 (1):98-119.
    Direct download (3 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   6 citations  
  • Referee report on an earlier draft of Peters and Ceci's target article.William A. Scott - 1982 - Behavioral and Brain Sciences 5 (2):238-238.
  • Thoughts beyond words: When language overshadows insight.Jonathan W. Schooler, Stellan Ohlsson & Kevin Brooks - 1993 - Journal of Experimental Psychology: General 122 (2):166.
  • Anosmic peer review: A rose by another name is evidently not a rose.Sandra Scarr - 1982 - Behavioral and Brain Sciences 5 (2):237-238.
  • Rejection, rebuttal, revision: Some flexible features of peer review.Donald B. Rubin - 1982 - Behavioral and Brain Sciences 5 (2):236-237.
  • Rejecting published work: Similar fate for fiction.Chuck Ross - 1982 - Behavioral and Brain Sciences 5 (2):236-236.
  • Reliability and bias in peer-review practices.Robert Rosenthal - 1982 - Behavioral and Brain Sciences 5 (2):235-236.
  • Reviewer reliability: Confusing random error with systematic error or bias.Stanley Presser - 1982 - Behavioral and Brain Sciences 5 (2):234-235.
  • 2004: A scenario of peer review in the future.Alan L. Porter - 1982 - Behavioral and Brain Sciences 5 (2):233-234.
  • Peer-review practices of psychological journals: The fate of published articles, submitted again.Douglas P. Peters & Stephen J. Ceci - 1982 - Behavioral and Brain Sciences 5 (2):187-195.
    A growing interest in and concern about the adequacy and fairness of modern peer-review practices in publication and funding are apparent across a wide range of scientific disciplines. Although questions about reliability, accountability, reviewer bias, and competence have been raised, there has been very little direct research on these variables.
    Direct download (4 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   192 citations  
  • Peer-review research: Objections and obligations.Douglas P. Peters & Stephen J. Ceci - 1982 - Behavioral and Brain Sciences 5 (2):246-255.
  • Reviewer “bias”: Do Peters and Ceci protest too much?Daniel Perlman - 1982 - Behavioral and Brain Sciences 5 (2):231-232.
  • Improving research on and policies for peer-review practices.Richard M. Perloff & Robert Perloff - 1982 - Behavioral and Brain Sciences 5 (2):232-233.
  • Biases, decisions and auctorial rebuttal in the peer-review process.David S. Palermo - 1982 - Behavioral and Brain Sciences 5 (2):230-231.
  • What is the source of bias in peer review?Ray Over - 1982 - Behavioral and Brain Sciences 5 (2):229-230.
  • Reliability, bias, or quality: What is the issue?Katherine Nelson - 1982 - Behavioral and Brain Sciences 5 (2):229-229.
  • Life as fiction.Kevin Murray - 1985 - Journal for the Theory of Social Behaviour 15 (2):173–187.
  • Designing peer review for the subjective as well as the objective side of science.Ian I. Mitroff - 1982 - Behavioral and Brain Sciences 5 (2):227-228.
  • When we practice to deceive: The ethics of a metascientific inquiry.Burton Mindick - 1982 - Behavioral and Brain Sciences 5 (2):226-227.
  • Making the plausible implausible: A favorable review of Peters and Ceci's target article.Jason Millman - 1982 - Behavioral and Brain Sciences 5 (2):225-226.
  • Beyond the schema given: Affective comprehension of literary narratives.David S. Miall - 1989 - Cognition and Emotion 3 (1):55-78.
    The narratives studied by schema-based models or story grammars are generally simpler than those found in literary texts, such as short stones or novels. Literary narratives are indeterminate, exhibiting conflicts between schemata and frequent ambiguities in the status of narrative elements. An account of the process of comprehending such complex narratives is beyond the reach of purely cognitive models. It is argued that during comprehension response is controlled by affect, which directs the creation of schemata more adequate to the text. (...)
    Direct download (4 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   11 citations  
  • Reform peer review: The Peters and Ceci study in the context of other current studies of scientific evaluation.Clyde Manwell & C. M. Ann Baker - 1982 - Behavioral and Brain Sciences 5 (2):221-225.
  • Toward a Theory of Intrinsically Motivating Instruction.Thomas W. Malone - 1981 - Cognitive Science 5 (4):333-369.
    First, a number of previous theories of intrinsic motivation are reviewed. Then, several studies of highly motivating computer games are described. These studies focus on what makes the games fun, not on what makes them educational. Finally, with this background, a rudimentary theory of intrinsically motivating instruction is developed, based on three categories: challenge, fantasy, and curiosity.Challenge is hypothesized to depend on goals with uncertain outcomes. Several ways of making outcomes uncertain are discussed, including variable difficulty level, multiple level goals, (...)
    Direct download (3 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   14 citations  
  • Publication, politics, and scientific progress.Michael J. Mahoney - 1982 - Behavioral and Brain Sciences 5 (2):220-221.
  • Putting “Culture” into Cultural Psychology: Anthropology's Role in the Development of Bruner's Cultural Psychology.Nancy C. Lutkehaus - 2008 - Ethos: Journal of the Society for Psychological Anthropology 36 (1):46-59.
  • Peer review: Prediction of the future or judgment of the past?Richard T. Louttit - 1982 - Behavioral and Brain Sciences 5 (2):219-220.
  • Interreferee agreement and acceptance rates in physics.David Lazarus - 1982 - Behavioral and Brain Sciences 5 (2):219-219.
  • Values Education in Hong Kong School Music Education: A Sociological Critique.Wing-Wah Law & Wai-Chung Ho - 2004 - British Journal of Educational Studies 52 (1):65 - 82.
    This article examines the social development of Hong Kong's cultural and national identity since its return from the UK to the People's Republic of China nearly six years ago, focusing on the extent to which Hong Kong students are now inculcated in traditional Chinese music and express their devotion to the PRC through singing the national anthem. Hong Kong music teachers experience conflicts concerning their roles as music teachers and as purveyors of values education. These observations raise fundamental questions concerning (...)
    Direct download (5 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark  
  • Peer reviewing: Improve or be rejected.Michael J. A. Howe - 1982 - Behavioral and Brain Sciences 5 (2):218-219.
  • Peer review: A philosophically faulty concept which is proving disastrous for science.David F. Horrobin - 1982 - Behavioral and Brain Sciences 5 (2):217-218.
  • Peer review in the physical sciences: An editor's view.William M. Honig - 1982 - Behavioral and Brain Sciences 5 (2):216-217.
  • The insufficiencies of methodological inadequacy.Robert Hogan - 1982 - Behavioral and Brain Sciences 5 (2):216-216.
  • Cognitive-methodological functions of metaphors.Marek Hetmański - 2021 - Argument: Biannual Philosophical Journal 11 (1).
    The paper analyzes the cognitive functions of metaphors present in both colloquial and scientific discourse. First, presented is the history of research into linguistic metaphors, followed by a discussion of the psycholinguistic turn towards metaphors as thought schemas, as well as metaphoricality embodied in gestures, images and behaviors and their socio-cultural contexts. Based on the analysis of metaphors in the natural sciences, mainly in physics as well as in psychology, the heuristic and methodological functions of metaphors in science are discussed. (...)
    No categories
    Direct download (2 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark  
  • Scientific communication: So where do we go from here?James Hartley - 1982 - Behavioral and Brain Sciences 5 (2):215-216.
  • Judging document content versus social functions of refereeing: Possible and impossible tasks.Belver C. Griffith - 1982 - Behavioral and Brain Sciences 5 (2):214-215.
  • Optional published refereeing.R. A. Gordon - 1982 - Behavioral and Brain Sciences 5 (2):213-214.