Switch to: References

Citations of:

Evolutionary Theory and the Epistemology of Science

In Kostas Kampourakis (ed.), The Philosophy of Biology: A Companion for Educators. Springer. pp. 101-119 (2013)

Add citations

You must login to add citations.
  1. Explanation and the Nature of Scientific Knowledge.Kevin McCain - 2015 - Science & Education 24 (7-8):827-854.
    Explaining phenomena is a primary goal of science. Consequently, it is unsurprising that gaining a proper understanding of the nature of explanation is an important goal of science education. In order to properly understand explanation, however, it is not enough to simply consider theories of the nature of explanation. Properly understanding explanation requires grasping the relation between explanation and understanding, as well as how explanations can lead to scientific knowledge. This article examines the nature of explanation, its relation to understanding, (...)
    Direct download (2 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   7 citations  
  • What good are abstract and what-if models? Lessons from the Gaïa hypothesis.Sébastien Dutreuil - 2014 - History and Philosophy of the Life Sciences 36 (1):16-41.
    This article on the epistemology of computational models stems from an analysis of the Gaia hypothesis (GH). It begins with James Kirchner’s criticisms of the central computational model of GH: Daisyworld. Among other things, the model has been criticized for being too abstract, describing fictional entities (fictive daisies on an imaginary planet) and trying to answer counterfactual (what-if) questions (how would a planet look like if life had no influence on it?). For these reasons the model has been considered not (...)
    Direct download (4 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   5 citations  
  • Michael Ruse, The Gaïa hypothesis: science on a pagan planet: University of Chicago Press, Chicago, 2013, 272 pp, $26.00. [REVIEW]Sébastien Dutreuil - 2014 - History and Philosophy of the Life Sciences 36 (1):149-151.
    This article on the epistemology of computational models stems from an analysis of the Gaïa hypothesis. It begins with James Kirchner’s criticisms of the central computational model of GH: Daisyworld. Among other things, the model has been criticized for being too abstract, describing fictional entities and trying to answer counterfactual questions. For these reasons the model has been considered not testable and therefore not legitimate in science, and in any case not very interesting since it explores non actual issues. This (...)
    Direct download (4 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark