Switch to: References

Add citations

You must login to add citations.
  1. The Virtues of a Good Fight: Assessing the Ethics of Fighting in the National Hockey League.Abe Zakhem - 2015 - Sport, Ethics and Philosophy 9 (1):32-46.
    Violence in sports is under intense public scrutiny. One hotly disputed issue concerns the acceptability of violent retaliation in sports, particular in the form of fighting in the National Hockey League. The question posed here is: Can fighting in the NHL be virtuous? Some think not, maintaining that fighting is undisciplined and ostensibly at odds with the virtues of good temper and justice. Contrary to this conclusion, this paper presents arguments that support the view that fighting in the NHL can (...)
    Direct download (4 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark  
  • Consent and Right Action in Sport.Steven Weimer - 2012 - Journal of the Philosophy of Sport 39 (1):11-31.
    This paper argues that recent treatments of ethics in sport have accorded too much importance to the promotion and portrayal of a sport’s excellences, and too little to the consent of participants First, I consider and reject a fundamental challenge to the idea that consent should play a central role in determining the morality of action in sport – namely, Sean McAleer’s argument to the effect that consent is incapable of rendering normally impermissible actions permissible in sport. I then offer (...)
    Direct download (3 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   13 citations  
  • A study on right or wrong of retaliatory-hit-batsman in baseball.Mitsuharu Omine, Hidenori Tomozoe & Kazuyuki Nagashima - 2013 - Journal of the Philosophy of Sport and Physical Education 35 (1):7-19.
  • A Critique of Violent Retaliation in Sport.Nicholas Dixon - 2010 - Journal of the Philosophy of Sport 37 (1):1-10.
  • One for One: A Defense of Pitcher Retaliation in Baseball.Alister Browne - 2015 - Journal of the Philosophy of Sport 42 (3):379-391.
    Baseball rules prohibit pitchers from intentionally throwing at batters. When a pitcher does so, however, it is common practice for a pitcher on the opposing team to retaliate by throwing at the first player of the offending team to bat the next inning, and for umpires to ignore the rule forbidding that. I argue that player retaliation in the form of one for one is a better response to the initial violation than any other that is available, one for one (...)
    Direct download (4 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   1 citation