Switch to: References

Add citations

You must login to add citations.
  1. The Variety of Consequence, According to Bolzano.Johan van Benthem - 1985 - Studia Logica 44 (4):389-403.
    Contemporary historians of logic tend to credit Bernard Bolzano with the invention of the semantic notion of consequence, a full century before Tarski. Nevertheless, Bolzano's work played no significant rôle in the genesis of modern logical semantics. The purpose of this paper is to point out three highly original, and still quite relevant themes in Bolzano's work, being a systematic study of possible types of inference, of consistency, as well as their meta-theory. There are certain analogies with Tarski's concerns here, (...)
    Direct download (2 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   9 citations  
  • The many faces of interpolation.Johan van Benthem - 2008 - Synthese 164 (3):451-460.
    We present a number of, somewhat unusual, ways of describing what Craig’s interpolation theorem achieves, and use them to identify some open problems and further directions.
    Direct download (8 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   6 citations  
  • The variety of consequence, according to Bolzano.Johan Benthem - 1985 - Studia Logica 44 (4):389 - 403.
    Contemporary historians of logic tend to credit Bernard Bolzano with the invention of the semantic notion, of consequence, a full century before Tarski. Nevertheless, Bolzano's work played no significant rôle in the genesis of modern logical semantics. The purpose of this paper is to point out three highly original, and still quite relevant themes in Bolzano's work, being a systematic study of possible types of inference, of consistency, as well as their meta-theory. There are certain analogies with Tarski's concerns here, (...)
    Direct download (4 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   8 citations  
  • Modal Languages and Bounded Fragments of Predicate Logic.Hajnal Andréka, István Németi & Johan van Benthem - 1998 - Journal of Philosophical Logic 27 (3):217 - 274.
    What precisely are fragments of classical first-order logic showing “modal” behaviour? Perhaps the most influential answer is that of Gabbay 1981, which identifies them with so-called “finite-variable fragments”, using only some fixed finite number of variables (free or bound). This view-point has been endorsed by many authors (cf. van Benthem 1991). We will investigate these fragments, and find that, illuminating and interesting though they are, they lack the required nice behaviour in our sense. (Several new negative results support this claim.) (...)
    Direct download (8 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   97 citations