Switch to: References

Add citations

You must login to add citations.
  1. A Question of Distributive and Social Justice: Public Relations Practitioners and the Marketplace.David L. Martinson - 1998 - Journal of Mass Media Ethics 13 (3):141-151.
    The marketplace of ideas theoy has been utilized as one means to justify,from a societal perspective, contempora y public relations practice. Proponents confend that practitioners serve society in true Miltonian fashion by helping clients inject their views into that marketplace. One must question, however, whether afunctional marketplace of ideas exists relative to the public relations process. Further, by focusing ethical questions on individualistic practitioner behavior relative to that marketplace, practitioners may not be paying sulyicient attention to the demands of distributive (...)
    Direct download (3 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   3 citations  
  • Social Sovereignty.Robert Latham - 2000 - Theory, Culture and Society 17 (4):1-18.
    Questions of sovereignty are unavoidable when considering the production of social power within the context of modernity and globalization. If sovereignty refers to the existence of a highest or supreme power over a set of people, things, or places, then we ought to question whether sovereignty can be legitimately `located' in an agent like a state. Is not supremacy more accurately associated with the structures of relations that set the terms for - or are constitutive of - a domain of (...)
    Direct download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   3 citations  
  • God and Man at the University of Chicago: Religious Commitments of Three Economists.J. Daniel Hammond - 2021 - Studia Gilsoniana 10 (5):1183–1217.
    The purpose of this paper is to examine how three very different Chicago economists, Milton Friedman, Frank H. Knight, and John U. Nef, Jr., handled the question of God and religion. The author shows that for each of these three figures, their stance on religion set limits on the effectiveness of their intellectual efforts in the public sphere of their university, the larger academic community, and American society.
    No categories
    Direct download (2 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark