Switch to: References

Add citations

You must login to add citations.
  1. Followability, Necessity, and Excuse: Interpreting Kant’s Penal Theory.Robert Campbell - forthcoming - Kantian Review:1-18.
    Philosophers traditionally interpret Kant as a retributivist, but modern interpreters, with reference to Kant’s theory of justice and problematic passages, instead propose penal theories that mix retributive and deterrent features. Although these mixed penal theories are substantively compelling and capture the Kantian spirit, their dual aspects lead to a justificatory conflict that generates an apparent dilemma. To resolve this dilemma and clear the ground for these mixed theories, I will outline and reinterpret Kant’s penal theory by situating it in his (...)
    Direct download (2 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark  
  • Kant-Bibliographie 2018.Margit Ruffing - 2020 - Kant Studien 111 (4):647-702.
    No categories
    Direct download (2 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   1 citation  
  • Kant's popular sovereignty and cosmopolitanism.Macarena Marey - 2020 - Constellations 27 (3):361-374.
  • Does the Kantian state dominate?: Freedom and majoritarian rule.Mike Gregory - 2023 - Ratio 36 (2):124-136.
    Recently, scholars have criticized what they call the “Kantian-Republican” thesis of freedom as non-domination. The main complaint is that domination is unavoidable. This concern can be separated into the problem of state domination, which suggests that the state's intervening powers necessarily dominate its citizens, and the problem of majority domination, which suggests that the People necessarily dominate individual citizen as a result of the potential to form dominating majorities.
    No categories
    Direct download (3 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark