Switch to: References

Add citations

You must login to add citations.
  1. Caring in the in-between: a proposal to introduce responsible AI and robotics to healthcare.Núria Vallès-Peris & Miquel Domènech - 2021 - AI and Society:1-11.
    In the scenario of growing polarization of promises and dangers that surround artificial intelligence (AI), how to introduce responsible AI and robotics in healthcare? In this paper, we develop an ethical–political approach to introduce democratic mechanisms to technological development, what we call “Caring in the In-Between”. Focusing on the multiple possibilities for action that emerge in the realm of uncertainty, we propose an ethical and responsible framework focused on care actions in between fears and hopes. Using the theoretical perspective of (...)
    Direct download (3 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   1 citation  
  • Decision-makers’ attitudes toward the use of care robots in welfare services.Outi Tuisku, Satu Pekkarinen, Lea Hennala & Helinä Melkas - forthcoming - AI and Society:1-14.
    The purpose of this study was to investigate the attitudes of decision-makers toward the use of care robots in welfare services. We investigated their knowledge regarding the use of care robots in welfare services as well as their attitudes toward using robots in their own care and in the care of various user groups, for example, children, youths, and older people. We conducted an online survey with a range of Finnish decision-makers as respondents. The respondents were divided into two groups: (...)
    Direct download (4 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark  
  • Introduction: special issue—critical robotics research.Sofia Serholt, Sara Ljungblad & Niamh Ní Bhroin - 2022 - AI and Society 37 (2):417-423.
  • Robot Technology for the Elderly and the Value of Veracity: Disruptive Technology or Reinvigorating Entrenched Principles?Seppe Segers - 2022 - Science and Engineering Ethics 28 (6):1-14.
    The implementation of care robotics in care settings is identified by some authors as a disruptive innovation, in the sense that it will upend the praxis of care. It is an open ethical question whether this alleged disruption will also have a transformative impact on established ethical concepts and principles. One prevalent worry is that the implementation of care robots will turn deception into a routine component of elderly care, at least to the extent that these robots will function as (...)
    No categories
    Direct download (3 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   2 citations  
  • Techno-bio-politics. On Interfacing Life with and Through Technology.Benjamin Lipp & Sabine Maasen - 2022 - NanoEthics 16 (1):133-150.
    Technology takes an unprecedented position in contemporary society. In particular, it has become part and parcel of governmental attempts to manufacture life in new ways. Such ideas concerning the governance of life organize around the same contention: that technology and life are, in fact, highly interconnectable. This is surprising because if one enters the sites of techno-scientific experimentation, those visions turn out to be much frailer and by no means “in place” yet. Rather, they afford or enforce constant interfacing work, (...)
    Direct download (3 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark