Switch to: References

Add citations

You must login to add citations.
  1. How Should a Speech Recognizer Work?Odette Scharenborg, Dennis Norris, Louis ten Bosch & James M. McQueen - 2005 - Cognitive Science 29 (6):867-918.
    Although researchers studying human speech recognition (HSR) and automatic speech recognition (ASR) share a common interest in how information processing systems (human or machine) recognize spoken language, there is little communication between the two disciplines. We suggest that this lack of communication follows largely from the fact that research in these related fields has focused on the mechanics of how speech can be recognized. In Marr's (1982) terms, emphasis has been on the algorithmic and implementational levels rather than on the (...)
    No categories
    Direct download (2 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   5 citations  
  • How Should a Speech Recognizer Work?Odette Scharenborg, Dennis Norris, Louis Bosch & James M. McQueen - 2005 - Cognitive Science 29 (6):867-918.
    Although researchers studying human speech recognition (HSR) and automatic speech recognition (ASR) share a common interest in how information processing systems (human or machine) recognize spoken language, there is little communication between the two disciplines. We suggest that this lack of communication follows largely from the fact that research in these related fields has focused on the mechanics of how speech can be recognized. In Marr's (1982) terms, emphasis has been on the algorithmic and implementational levels rather than on the (...)
    No categories
    Direct download (4 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   7 citations  
  • The ghost of Christmas future: didn't Scrooge learn to be good? Commentary on Magnuson, McMurray, Tanenhaus, and Aslin (2003).James M. McQueen - 2003 - Cognitive Science 27 (5):795-799.
    Direct download (2 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   5 citations  
  • Lexically Mediated Compensation for Coarticulation Still as Elusive as a White Christmash.James M. McQueen, Alexandra Jesse & Holger Mitterer - 2023 - Cognitive Science 47 (9):e13342.
    Luthra, Peraza-Santiago, Beeson, Saltzman, Crinnion, and Magnuson (2021) present data from the lexically mediated compensation for coarticulation paradigm that they claim provides conclusive evidence in favor of top-down processing in speech perception. We argue here that this evidence does not support that conclusion. The findings are open to alternative explanations, and we give data in support of one of them (that there is an acoustic confound in the materials). Lexically mediated compensation for coarticulation thus remains elusive, while prior data from (...)
    Direct download (3 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   1 citation  
  • Infants are sensitive to within-category variation in speech perception.Bob McMurray & Richard N. Aslin - 2005 - Cognition 95 (2):B15-B26.
    Direct download (4 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   15 citations  
  • Context Effects on Musical Chord Categorization: Different Forms of Top‐Down Feedback in Speech and Music?Bob McMurray, Joel L. Dennhardt & Andrew Struck-Marcell - 2008 - Cognitive Science 32 (5):893-920.
    A critical issue in perception is the manner in which top‐down expectancies guide lower level perceptual processes. In speech, a common paradigm is to construct continua ranging between two phonetic endpoints and to determine how higher level lexical context influences the perceived boundary. We applied this approach to music, presenting participants with major/minor triad continua after brief musical contexts. Two experiments yielded results that differed from classic results in speech perception. In speech, context generally expands the category of the expected (...)
    Direct download (2 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   1 citation  
  • Interactive Activation and Mutual Constraint Satisfaction in Perception and Cognition.James L. McClelland, Daniel Mirman, Donald J. Bolger & Pranav Khaitan - 2014 - Cognitive Science 38 (6):1139-1189.
    In a seminal 1977 article, Rumelhart argued that perception required the simultaneous use of multiple sources of information, allowing perceivers to optimally interpret sensory information at many levels of representation in real time as information arrives. Building on Rumelhart's arguments, we present the Interactive Activation hypothesis—the idea that the mechanism used in perception and comprehension to achieve these feats exploits an interactive activation process implemented through the bidirectional propagation of activation among simple processing units. We then examine the interactive activation (...)
    Direct download (2 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   18 citations  
  • Lexical effects on compensation for coarticulation: a tale of two systems?James S. Magnuson, Bob McMurray, Michael K. Tanenhaus & Richard N. Aslin - 2003 - Cognitive Science 27 (5):801-805.
    Direct download (2 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   5 citations  
  • Interaction in Spoken Word Recognition Models: Feedback Helps.James S. Magnuson, Daniel Mirman, Sahil Luthra, Ted Strauss & Harlan D. Harris - 2018 - Frontiers in Psychology 9.
    Direct download (6 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   8 citations  
  • Contra assertions, feedback improves word recognition: How feedback and lateral inhibition sharpen signals over noise.James S. Magnuson, Anne Marie Crinnion, Sahil Luthra, Phoebe Gaston & Samantha Grubb - 2024 - Cognition 242 (C):105661.
    Direct download (2 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark  
  • Robust Lexically Mediated Compensation for Coarticulation: Christmash Time Is Here Again.Sahil Luthra, Giovanni Peraza-Santiago, Keia'na Beeson, David Saltzman, Anne Marie Crinnion & James S. Magnuson - 2021 - Cognitive Science 45 (4):e12962.
    A long-standing question in cognitive science is how high-level knowledge is integrated with sensory input. For example, listeners can leverage lexical knowledge to interpret an ambiguous speech sound, but do such effects reflect direct top-down influences on perception or merely postperceptual biases? A critical test case in the domain of spoken word recognition is lexically mediated compensation for coarticulation (LCfC). Previous LCfC studies have shown that a lexically restored context phoneme (e.g., /s/ in Christma#) can alter the perceived place of (...)
    Direct download (2 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   2 citations  
  • Are there interactive processes in speech perception?Lori L. Holt James L. McClelland, Daniel Mirman - 2006 - Trends in Cognitive Sciences 10 (8):363.