Switch to: References

Citations of:

Feminist bioethics: where we've been, where we're going

In Kittay Eva Feder & Martín Alcoff Linda (eds.), The Blackwell Guide to Feminist Philosophy. New York: Wiley-Blackwell. pp. 116–130 (2006)

Add citations

You must login to add citations.
  1. Bio-Technosciences in Philosophy: Challenges and Perspectives for Gender Studies in Philosophy.Susanne Lettow - 2010 - Diogenes 57 (1):127-137.
    Since the 1960s the bio/technosciences have occupied a central place in philosophical thinking. The paper sets out three theoretical configurations embodying major challenges for today’s gender studies in philosophy, since they raise an obstacle, each in its own way, to the discussion on implications of the bio/technosciences in the political field and the area of gender theory: firstly naturalism in the field of the philosophy of science; secondly the paradigm of applied ethics; and thirdly the discourse of philosophical anthropology that (...)
    Direct download (2 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   2 citations  
  • Expressive Touch and the Attitude of Care: The Case for LGBT-Inclusive Intake in Aging Network Services.Tim R. Johnston - 2017 - International Journal of Feminist Approaches to Bioethics 10 (1):194-209.
    This article uses the work of Eva Feder Kittay and Maurice Merleau-Ponty to advocate for LGBT-inclusive intake questions across aging network services. I argue that care providers need to know their charge's sexual orientation and/or gender identity because caring touch is responsive, meaning that the care provider understands how her touch will be perceived and can change her actions accordingly. Information about a charge's sexual orientation and/or gender identity is one important way to furnish the care provider with the information (...)
    No categories
    Direct download (4 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark  
  • Why the Little Mermaid stopped singing: how oppressive social forces silence children's voices, and rob them of the opportunity to develop and exercise autonomy in the health care context.Lori Seller - unknown
    The “new sociology of childhood” replaces the historical notion of children as inherently vulnerable, helpless and in need of protection, with a perception of children as capable of competent, autonomous, social participation. Although this new sociological perception underlies current children's rights literature, Canadian common law, and important Canadian pediatric health care guidelines, children's autonomy in health care contexts remains easily denied or subverted in favour of adult conceptions of their best interests. In order to try to understand why, I use (...)
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark