Switch to: References

Add citations

You must login to add citations.
  1. In for a Penny, or: If You Disapprove of Investment Migration, Why Do You Approve of High-Skilled Migration?Lior Erez - 2021 - Moral Philosophy and Politics 8 (1):155-178.
    While many argue investment-based criteria for immigration are wrong or at least problematic, skill-based criteria remain relatively uncontroversial. This is normatively inconsistent. This article assesses three prominent normative objections to investment-based selection criteria for immigrants: that they wrongfully discriminate between prospective immigrants that they are unfair, and that they undermine political equality among citizens. It argues that either skill-based criteria are equally susceptible to these objections, or that investment-based criteria are equally shielded from them. Indeed, in some ways investment-based criteria (...)
    Direct download (3 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   3 citations  
  • Redistribution and moral consistency: arguments for granting automatic citizenship to refugees.Arianne Shahvisi - 2020 - Journal of Global Ethics 16 (2):182-202.
    1. Birth within a particular state is a major determinant of a person’s life course: their life expectancy, health possibilities, income, level of education, employment opportunities, and the safet...
    Direct download (2 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark  
    		•
  • The indirect gender discrimination of skill-selective immigration policies.Desiree Lim - 2019 - Critical Review of International Social and Political Philosophy 22 (7):906-928.
    Direct download (2 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   2 citations  
  • Clarifying our duties to resist.Chong-Ming Lim - forthcoming - Inquiry: An Interdisciplinary Journal of Philosophy 1.
    According to a prominent argument, citizens in unjust societies have a duty to resist injustice. The moral and political principles that ground the duty to obey the law in just or nearly just conditions, also ground the duty to resist in unjust conditions. This argument is often applied to a variety of unjust conditions. In this essay, I critically examine this argument, focusing on conditions involving institutionally entrenched and socially normalised injustice. In such conditions, the issue of citizens’ duties to (...)
    Direct download (4 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark  
    		•
  • Skill‐selection and socioeconomic status: An analysis of migration and domestic justice.Michael Ball-Blakely - 2022 - Journal of Social Philosophy 53 (4):595-613.
    In this paper I present two reasons why generalized skill-selection--a policy whereby skill, education, and economic independence are indefinitely prioritized in immigration decisions--is pro tanto unjust. First, such policies feed into existing biases, exacerbating status harms for low-SES citizens. The claim that we prefer the skilled to the unskilled, the educated to the uneducated, and the financially secure to the insecure is also heard by citizens. And there is considerable overlap between this message and the stereotypes and biases that set (...)
    Direct download (4 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark  
    		•