Switch to: References

Add citations

You must login to add citations.
  1. Who are “we”? Dealing with conflicting moral obligations.Alex Shaw & Shoham Choshen-Hillel - 2020 - Behavioral and Brain Sciences 43.
    Satisfying one's obligations is an important part of being human. However, people's obligations can often prescribe contradictory behaviors. Moral obligations conflict, and so do obligations to different groups. We propose that a broader framework is needed to account for how people balance different social and moral obligations.
    No categories
    Direct download (2 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark  
  • Who Is to Blame? Children's and Adults' Moral Judgments Regarding Victim and Transgressor Negligence.Kelly Lynn Mulvey, Seçil Gönültaş & Cameron B. Richardson - 2020 - Cognitive Science 44 (4):e12833.
    Research has documented that individuals consider outcomes, intentions, and transgressor negligence when making morally relevant judgments (Nobes, Panagiotaki, & Engelhardt, 2017). However, less is known about whether individuals attend to both victim and transgressor negligence in their evaluations. The current study measured 3‐ to 6‐year‐olds (N = 70), 7‐ to 12‐year‐olds (N = 54), and adults' (N = 97, ages 18–25 years) moral judgments about scenarios in which an accidental transgression occurred involving property damage or physical harm. Participants were either (...)
    No categories
    Direct download (2 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   3 citations