Switch to: References

Citations of:

The complexity of Aristotle's study of animals

In Christopher Shields (ed.), The Oxford Handbook of Aristotle. Oup Usa. pp. 287 (2012)

Add citations

You must login to add citations.
  1. Frequency and Content of the Last Fifty Years of Papers on Aristotle’s Writings on Biological Phenomena.Christopher F. Sharpley & Clemens Koehn - 2022 - Journal of the History of Biology 55 (3):585-607.
    Aristotle is often named as the first zoologist or biologist because of his writings on animals. Although Aristotle’s major intention in these books was to illustrate his ideas of how knowledge and understanding might advance, at least one modern biologist (C. Darwin) has recognized Aristotle's depth and breadth as being of surviving merit. Of greater surprise is the ongoing attention that his works continue to receive, including publications in contemporary scientific journals. This review identifies 38 peer-reviewed papers on various topics (...)
    Direct download (3 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark  
  • Per una spiegazione causale delle differenze tra gli animali: Aristotele, Historia animalium I 1.Giulia Mingucci - 2023 - Elenchos: Rivista di Studi Sul Pensiero Antico 44 (1):65-91.
    It is now a widespread opinion among interpreters that Aristotle’s History of Animals is not a mere collection of empirical data but has its own theoretical framework; however, there is still disagreement as to exactly what this framework is. To address the problem, the article analyzes in detail the diairetic schemes of HA I 1, attempting to overturn the common opinion that this chapter is a mere expository introduction to the study of animals’ differences. On the contrary, it will be (...)
    No categories
    Direct download (2 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark