Switch to: References

Add citations

You must login to add citations.
  1. Wallace, Free Choice, and Fatalism.Gila Sher - 2015 - In Steven M. Cahn & Maureen Eckert (eds.), Freedom and the Self: Essays on the Philosophy of David Foster Wallace. New York: Columbia University Press. pp. 31-56.
    In this paper I reconstruct David Foster Wallace’s argument against fatalism in his undergraduate honors thesis, “Richard Taylor’s ‘Fatalism’ and the Semantics of Physical Modality”. My goal is to present the argument in a clear and concise way, so that it is easy to see its main line of reasoning and potential power. A secondary goal is to offer clarificatory and critical notes on some of the issues at stake. The reconstruction reveals interesting connections between Wallace’s argument and John MacFarlane’s (...)
    Direct download (4 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark  
  • Moral Responsibility, Freedom, and Alternate Possibilities.Michael J. Zimmerman - 1982 - Pacific Philosophical Quarterly 63 (3):243.
    Frankfurt has attacked the principle that a person is morally responsible for what he has done only if he could have done otherwise, And he has thereby sought to undermine the traditional debate between compatibilists and incompatibilists. The role that the principle plays in this debate is clarified. Frankfurt's type of argument is then assessed for its implications concerning both the principle and the debate. It is argued that the debate, Even if not the principle, May well emerge intact.
    Direct download (4 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   5 citations  
  • Tensed modalities.R. S. Woolhouse - 1973 - Journal of Philosophical Logic 2 (3):393 - 415.
    Direct download (6 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   5 citations  
  • Discrete tense logic with infinitary inference rules and systematic frame constants: A Hilbert-style axiomatization. [REVIEW]Lennart Åqvist - 1996 - Journal of Philosophical Logic 25 (1):45 - 100.
    The paper deals with the problem of axiomatizing a system T1 of discrete tense logic, where one thinks of time as the set Z of all the integers together with the operations +1 ("immediate successor") and-1 ("immediate predecessor"). T1 is like the Segerberg-Sundholm system WI in working with so-called infinitary inference ruldes; on the other hand, it differs from W I with respect to (i) proof-theoretical setting, (ii) presence of past tense operators and a "now" operator, and, most importantly, with (...)
    Direct download (4 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark  
    		•
  • Neglecting to do what one can: A reply.Keith Lehrer - 1969 - Mind 78 (309):121-123.
    No categories
    Direct download (6 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark  
    		•
  • Reply to Brueckner.Joseph Keim Campbell - 2008 - Analysis 68 (3):264-269.
    Direct download (8 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   15 citations  
  • Keith Lehrer on Compatibilism.Joe Campbell & Keith Lehrer - 2018 - The Journal of Ethics 22 (2):225-233.
    Keith Lehrer has been publishing on free will and compatiblism since 1960. Our concern here is to present an account of the development on his work on the subject.
    No categories
    Direct download (2 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   1 citation  
  • Free will and the necessity of the past.Joseph Keim Campbell - 2007 - Analysis 67 (2):105-111.
    Direct download (10 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   43 citations