Switch to: References

Add citations

You must login to add citations.
  1. Darwin's mistake: Explaining the discontinuity between human and nonhuman minds.Derek C. Penn, Keith J. Holyoak & Daniel J. Povinelli - 2008 - Behavioral and Brain Sciences 31 (2):109-130.
    Over the last quarter century, the dominant tendency in comparative cognitive psychology has been to emphasize the similarities between human and nonhuman minds and to downplay the differences as (Darwin 1871). In the present target article, we argue that Darwin was mistaken: the profound biological continuity between human and nonhuman animals masks an equally profound discontinuity between human and nonhuman minds. To wit, there is a significant discontinuity in the degree to which human and nonhuman animals are able to approximate (...)
    Direct download (6 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   227 citations  
  • When learning to classify by relations is easier than by features.Bradley C. Love & Marc T. Tomlinson - 2010 - Thinking and Reasoning 16 (4):372-401.
  • Modal Similarity.Dr Ronaldo Vigo - unknown
    Just as Boolean rules define Boolean categories, the Boolean operators define higher-order Boolean categories referred to as modal categories. We examine the similarity order between these categories and the standard category of logical identity (i.e. the modal category defined by the biconditional or equivalence operator). Our goal is 4-fold: first, to introduce a similarity measure for determining this similarity order; second, to show that such a measure is a good predictor of the similarity assessment behaviour observed in our experiment involving (...)
    Direct download (2 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   4 citations