Switch to: References

Add citations

You must login to add citations.
  1. Brill's Companion to Anarchism and Philosophy.Nathan J. Jun (ed.) - 2017 - Leiden: Brill.
    Despite the recent proliferation of scholarship on anarchism, very little attention has been paid to the historical and theoretical relationship between anarchism and philosophy. Seeking to fill this void, Brill's Companion to Anarchism and Philosophy draws upon the combined expertise of several top scholars to provide a broad thematic overview of the various ways anarchism and philosophy have intersected. Each of its 18 chapters adopts a self-consciously inventive approach to its subject matter, examining anarchism's relation to other philosophical theories and (...)
    Direct download (2 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark  
  • Anarchist ambivalence: Politics and violence in the thought of Bakunin, Tolstoy and Kropotkin.Elizabeth Frazer & Kimberly Hutchings - 2019 - European Journal of Political Theory 18 (2):259-280.
    There appear to be striking contradictions between different strands of anarchist thought with respect to violence – anarchism can justify it, or condemn it, can be associated with both violent action and pacifism. The anarchist thinkers studied here saw themselves as facing up to the realities of violence in politics – the violence of state power, and the destructiveness of instrumental uses of physical power as a revolutionary political weapon. Bakunin, Tolstoy and Kropotkin all express ambivalence about violence in relation (...)
    Direct download (2 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark  
    		•
  • Rethinking the Anarchist Canon: History, Philosophy, and Interpretation.Nathan Jun - 2013 - Anarchist Developments in Cultural Studies 3 (1):79-111.
    How we define the anarchist canon—let alone how we decide which thinkers, theories, and texts should count as canonical—depends very much on what we take the purpose of the anarchist canon to be. In this essay, I distinguish between thinkers, theories, or texts that are “anarchist,” by virtue of belonging to actually-existing historical anarchist movements, and those which are “anarchist” in virtue of expressing “anarchistic” (or “anarchic”) ideas. I argue that the anarchist canon is best conceived as a repository of (...)
    Direct download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   1 citation