Switch to: References

Add citations

You must login to add citations.
  1. Normative Philosophy of Science: Responding to Special-Interest Science.Kristin Shrader-Frechette - 2018 - Axiomathes 28 (6):679-693.
    This article shows why it is important to do normative or practical philosophy of science, especially philosophy of science that criticizes and evaluates contemporary use of scientific methods to analyze welfare-affecting societal problems. The article introduces the scientific, ethical, and social problem of environmental injustice—disproportionate environmental and pollution threats that are responsible for roughly 40% of all preventable disease and death. Next it explains that many deadly threats continue in part because of “special-interest science”, methodologically flawed science that is done (...)
    Direct download (2 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   1 citation  
  • Answering "Scientific" Attacks on Ethical Imperatives: Wind and Solar Versus Nuclear Solutions to Climate Change.Kristin Shrader-Frechette - 2013 - Ethics and the Environment 18 (1):1-17.
    Scientists and engineers often are not much interested in theoretical-ethics discussions. Frequently, like Harvard’s Cass Sunstein (2002), they propose “freemarket environmentalism,” basing environmental decisions on cost-benefit analysis and on saving the greatest number of lives for the fewest number of dollars. They say that when society overregulates, by emotively and irrationally rejecting environmental-risk decisions based only on cost-benefit analysis (CBA), it reduces manufacturing jobs, shrinks the economic pie, makes people poorer, and thus causes unnecessary deaths. To avoid these economic problems—that (...)
    Direct download (6 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   1 citation