Switch to: References

Add citations

You must login to add citations.
  1. The naturalness of the artificial and our concepts of health, disease and medicine.Y. Michael Barilan & Moshe Weintraub - 2001 - Medicine, Health Care and Philosophy 4 (3):311-325.
    This article isolates ten prepositions, which constitute the undercurrent paradigm of contemporary discourse of health disease and medicine. Discussion of the interrelationship between those prepositions leads to a systematic refutation of this paradigm. An alternative set is being forwarded. The key notions of the existing paradigm are that health is the natural condition of humankind and that disease is a deviance from that nature. Natural things are harmonious and healthy while human made artifacts are coercive interference with natural balance. It (...)
    Direct download (4 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   7 citations  
  • Futility, Conscientious Refusal, and Who Gets to Decide.J. K. Davis - 2008 - Journal of Medicine and Philosophy 33 (4):356-373.
    Most discussions of medical futility try to answer the Futility Question: when is a medical procedure futile? No answer enjoys universal support. Some futility policies say that the health care provider will answer this question when the provider and patient cannot agree. This raises the Decision Question: who has the moral authority to decide what to do in cases where futility is disputed? I look for a procedural answer to this question, an answer that does not turn on whether a (...)
    Direct download (4 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   4 citations  
  • The role of futility judgments in improperly limiting the scope of clinical research.W. Harper - 1998 - Journal of Medical Ethics 24 (5):308-313.
    In medical research, the gathering and presenting of data can be limited in accordance with the futility judgments of the researchers. In that case, research results falling below the threshold of what the researchers deem beneficial would not to be reported in detail. As a result, the reported information would tend to be useful only to those who share the valuational assumptions of the researchers. Should this practice become entrenched, it would reduce public confidence in the medical establishment, aggravate factionalism (...)
    Direct download (7 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   1 citation  
  • Physicians' disagreements about life-sustaining treatments: A case study. [REVIEW]Elisa J. Gordon & Anita H. Weiss - 1999 - HEC Forum 11 (2):101-121.
    Direct download (3 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark  
  • Medical futility: Towards consensus on disagreement. [REVIEW]Jeffrey T. Berger, Fred Rosner, Joel Potash, Pieter Kark, Peter Farnsworth & Allen J. Bennett - 1998 - HEC Forum 10 (1):102-118.