Switch to: References

Add citations

You must login to add citations.
  1. Eye’ll Help You Out! How the Gaze Cue Reduces the Cognitive Load Required for Reference Processing.Mirjana Sekicki & Maria Staudte - 2018 - Cognitive Science 42 (8):2418-2458.
    Referential gaze has been shown to benefit language processing in situated communication in terms of shifting visual attention and leading to shorter reaction times on subsequent tasks. The present study simultaneously assessed both visual attention and, importantly, the immediate cognitive load induced at different stages of sentence processing. We aimed to examine the dynamics of combining visual and linguistic information in creating anticipation for a specific object and the effect this has on language processing. We report evidence from three visual‐world (...)
    No categories
    Direct download (2 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   5 citations  
  • Forward models and their implications for production, comprehension, and dialogue.Martin J. Pickering & Simon Garrod - 2013 - Behavioral and Brain Sciences 36 (4):377-392.
    Our target article proposed that language production and comprehension are interwoven, with speakers making predictions of their own utterances and comprehenders making predictions of other people's utterances at different linguistic levels. Here, we respond to comments about such issues as cognitive architecture and its neural basis, learning and development, monitoring, the nature of forward models, communicative intentions, and dialogue.
    Direct download (5 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   13 citations  
  • An integrated theory of language production and comprehension.Martin J. Pickering & Simon Garrod - 2013 - Behavioral and Brain Sciences 36 (4):329-347.
    Currently, production and comprehension are regarded as quite distinct in accounts of language processing. In rejecting this dichotomy, we instead assert that producing and understanding are interwoven, and that this interweaving is what enables people to predict themselves and each other. We start by noting that production and comprehension are forms of action and action perception. We then consider the evidence for interweaving in action, action perception, and joint action, and explain such evidence in terms of prediction. Specifically, we assume (...)
    Direct download (7 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   157 citations  
  • The role of body and environment in cognition.Dermot Lynott, Louise Connell & Judith Holler - 2013 - Frontiers in Psychology 4.
    Direct download (7 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   2 citations  
  • Preparing to be punched: Prediction may not always require inference of intentions.Helene Kreysa - 2013 - Behavioral and Brain Sciences 36 (4):362 - 363.
    Pickering & Garrod's (P&G's) framework assumes an efference copy based on the interlocutor's intentions. Yet, elaborate attribution of intentions may not always be necessary for online prediction. Instead, contextual cues such as speaker gaze can provide similar information with a lower demand on processing resources.
    Direct download (4 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark  
    		•
  • Reductionism about understanding why.Insa Lawler - 2016 - Proceedings of the Aristotelian Society 116 (2):229-236.
    Paulina Sliwa (2015) argues that knowing why p is necessary and sufficient for understanding why p. She tries to rebut recent attacks against the necessity and sufficiency claims, and explains the gradability of understanding why in terms of knowledge. I argue that her attempts do not succeed, but I indicate more promising ways to defend reductionism about understanding why throughout the discussion.
    Direct download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   14 citations