Switch to: References

Add citations

You must login to add citations.
  1. Introduction to the Topical Collection on AI and Responsibility.Niël Conradie, Hendrik Kempt & Peter Königs - 2022 - Philosophy and Technology 35 (4):1-6.
    No categories
    Direct download (3 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark  
  • Reasons for Meaningful Human Control.Herman Veluwenkamp - 2022 - Ethics and Information Technology 24 (4):1-9.
    ”Meaningful human control” is a term invented in the political and legal debate on autonomous weapons system, but it is nowadays also used in many other contexts. It is supposed to specify conditions under which an artificial system is under the right kind of control to avoid responsibility gaps: that is, situations in which no moral agent is responsible. Santoni de Sio and Van den Hoven have recently suggested a framework that can be used by system designers to operationalize this (...)
    Direct download (3 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   1 citation  
  • Artificial intelligence and responsibility gaps: what is the problem?Peter Königs - 2022 - Ethics and Information Technology 24 (3):1-11.
    Recent decades have witnessed tremendous progress in artificial intelligence and in the development of autonomous systems that rely on artificial intelligence. Critics, however, have pointed to the difficulty of allocating responsibility for the actions of an autonomous system, especially when the autonomous system causes harm or damage. The highly autonomous behavior of such systems, for which neither the programmer, the manufacturer, nor the operator seems to be responsible, has been suspected to generate responsibility gaps. This has been the cause of (...)
    Direct download (3 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   4 citations  
  • The Responsibility Gap and LAWS: a Critical Mapping of the Debate.Ann-Katrien Oimann - 2023 - Philosophy and Technology 36 (1):1-22.
    AI has numerous applications and in various fields, including the military domain. The increase in the degree of autonomy in some decision-making systems leads to discussions on the possible future use of lethal autonomous weapons systems (LAWS). A central issue in these discussions is the assignment of moral responsibility for some AI-based outcomes. Several authors claim that the high autonomous capability of such systems leads to a so-called “responsibility gap.” In recent years, there has been a surge in philosophical literature (...)
    No categories
    Direct download (3 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark