- Parallel path: Poliovirus research in the vaccine era.Michele S. Garfinkel & Daniel Sarewitz - 2003 - Science and Engineering Ethics 9 (3):319-338.details
|
|
Human Rationality Challenges Universal Logic.Brian R. Gaines - 2010 - Logica Universalis 4 (2):163-205.details
|
|
Epistemology in Japan: 2000-2005.Tomohisa Furuta - 2007 - Annals of the Japan Association for Philosophy of Science 15 (2):53-79.details
|
|
Science Democratised = Expertise Decommissioned.Steve Fuller - 2007 - Spontaneous Generations 1 (1).details
|
|
Is scientific theory change similar to early cognitive development? Gopnik on science and childhood.Tim Fuller - 2013 - Philosophical Psychology 26 (1):109 - 128.details
|
|
Descriptive vs Revisionary Social Epistemology: The Former as Seen by the Latter.Steve Fuller - 2004 - Episteme 1 (1):23-34.details
|
|
Deviant interdisciplinarity as philosophical practice: prolegomena to deep intellectual history.Steve Fuller - 2013 - Synthese 190 (11):1899-1916.details
|
|
Epistemic democracy and the social character of knowledge.Michael Fuerstein - 2008 - Episteme 5 (1):pp. 74-93.details
|
|
Confused Terms in Ordinary Language.Greg Frost-Arnold & James R. Beebe - 2020 - Journal of Logic, Language and Information 29 (2):197-219.details
|
|
Can the Pessimistic Induction be Saved from Semantic Anti-Realism about Scientific Theory?Greg Frost-Arnold - 2014 - British Journal for the Philosophy of Science 65 (3):521-548.details
|
|
Robustness and Idealizations in Agent-Based Models of Scientific Interaction.Daniel Frey & Dunja Šešelja - 2019 - British Journal for the Philosophy of Science 71 (4):1411-1437.details
|
|
Normative naturalism and epistemic relativism.Karyn L. Freedman - 2006 - International Studies in the Philosophy of Science 20 (3):309 – 322.details
|
|
Disagreement or denialism? “Invasive species denialism” and ethical disagreement in science.David M. Frank - 2019 - Synthese 198 (Suppl 25):6085-6113.details
|
|
Spandrels and a pervasive problem of evidence.Patrick Forber - 2009 - Biology and Philosophy 24 (2):247-266.details
|
|
Forever beyond our grasp?: Review of P. Kyle Stanford , Exceeding Our Grasp: Science, History, and the Problem of Unconceived Alternatives.Patrick Forber - 2008 - Biology and Philosophy 23 (1):135-141.details
|
|
Economics Imperialism in Social Epistemology: A Critical Assessment.Manuela Fernández Pinto - 2016 - Philosophy of the Social Sciences 46 (5):443-472.details
|
|
An economic model of scientific rules.José Luis Ferreira & Jesús Zamora-Bonilla - 2006 - Economics and Philosophy 22 (2):191-212.details
|
|
Cambio teórico y progreso en bioquímica.Lucia Federico & Jorge Paruelo - 2016 - Revista de Humanidades de Valparaíso 7:23-42.details
|
|
Incommensurability, Comparability, and Non-reductive Ontological Relations.José L. Falguera & Xavier Donato-Rodríguez - 2016 - Journal for General Philosophy of Science / Zeitschrift für Allgemeine Wissenschaftstheorie 47 (1):37-58.details
|
|
Collective epistemic goals.Don Fallis - 2007 - Social Epistemology 21 (3):267 – 280.details
|
|
Scientific Revolutions and the Explosion of Scientific Evidence.Ludwig Fahrbach - 2017 - Synthese 194 (12):5039-5072.details
|
|
P. Kyle Stanford exceeding our grasp: Science, history, and the problem of unconceived alternatives.Patrick Enfield - 2008 - British Journal for the Philosophy of Science 59 (4):881-895.details
|
|
True enough.Catherine Z. Elgin - 2004 - Philosophical Issues 14 (1):113–131.details
|
|
Expanding Our Grasp: Causal Knowledge and the Problem of Unconceived Alternatives.Matthias Egg - 2016 - British Journal for the Philosophy of Science 67 (1):115-141.details
|
|
Social Coordination in Scientific Communities.David Eck - 2016 - Perspectives on Science 24 (6):770-800.details
|
|
Two Views About Explicitly Teaching Nature of Science.Richard A. Duschl & Richard Grandy - 2013 - Science & Education 22 (9):2109-2139.details
|
|
The lure of the simplistic.John Dupré - 2002 - Proceedings of the Philosophy of Science Association 2002 (3):S284-S293.details
|
|
Social epistemology: what’s in a name?: Miranda Fricker, Peter J. Graham, David Henderson, and Nikolaj J.L.L. Pederson (eds): The Routledge handbook of social epistemology. London: Routledge, 2019, 490 pp, £190.00 HB.Chris Dragos - 2020 - Metascience 29 (3):399-401.details
|
|
From philosophy of biology to social philosophy.Stephen M. Downes - 2006 - Biology and Philosophy 21 (2):299-307.details
|
|
Agents and norms in the new economics of science.Stephen M. Downes - 2001 - Philosophy of the Social Sciences 31 (2):224-238.details
|
|
Testing Inference To The Best Explanation.Igor Douven - 2002 - Synthese 130 (3):355-377.details
|
|
Fitch’s Paradox and Probabilistic Antirealism.Igor Douven - 2007 - Studia Logica 86 (2):149-182.details
|
|
Assertion, Moore, and Bayes.Igor Douven - 2009 - Philosophical Studies 144 (3):361-375.details
|
|
A Davidsonian argument against incommensurability.Igor Douven & Henk W. De Regt - 2002 - International Studies in the Philosophy of Science 16 (2):157 – 169.details
|
|
The epistemic benefits of religious disagreement.Katherine Dormandy - 2020 - Religious Studies 56 (3):390-408.details
|
|
From Standard Scientific Realism and Structural Realism to Best Current Theory Realism.Gerald D. Doppelt - 2011 - Journal for General Philosophy of Science / Zeitschrift für Allgemeine Wissenschaftstheorie 42 (2):295-316.details
|
|
Understanding Scientific Methodology in the Historical and Experimental Sciences via Language Analysis.Jeff Dodick, Shlomo Argamon & Paul Chase - 2009 - Science & Education 18 (8):985-1004.details
|
|
Why Does Laudan’s Confutation of Convergent Realism Fail?Antonio Diéguez-Lucena - 2006 - Journal for General Philosophy of Science / Zeitschrift für Allgemeine Wissenschaftstheorie 37 (2):393 - 403.details
|
|
La relatividad conceptual y el problema de la verdad.Antonio Diéguez - 2020 - Scientia in Verba Magazine 6 (1):105-120.details
|
|
Who Got What Wrong? Fodor and Piattelli on Darwin: Guiding Principles and Explanatory Models in Natural Selection.José Díez & Pablo Lorenzano - 2013 - Erkenntnis 78 (5):1143-1175.details
|
|
Scientific w-Explanation as Ampliative, Specialized Embedding: A Neo-Hempelian Account.José Díez - 2014 - Erkenntnis 79 (S8):1413-1443.details
|
|
Are natural selection explanatory models a priori?José Díez & Pablo Lorenzano - 2015 - Biology and Philosophy 30 (6):787-809.details
|
|
Are Unconceived Alternatives a Problem for Scientific Realism?Michael Devitt - 2011 - Journal for General Philosophy of Science / Zeitschrift für Allgemeine Wissenschaftstheorie 42 (2):285-293.details
|
|
On the Harms of Agnotological Practices and How to Address Them.Inmaculada de Melo-Martín - 2023 - International Studies in the Philosophy of Science 36 (3):211-228.details
|
|
The Epistemic Value of Expert Autonomy.Finnur Dellsén - 2018 - Philosophy and Phenomenological Research (2):344-361.details
|
|
Realism and the absence of rivals.Finnur Dellsén - 2017 - Synthese 194 (7):2427-2446.details
|
|
Ruthless reductionism: A review essay of John Bickle's philosophy and neuroscience: A ruthlessly reductive account. [REVIEW]Huib L. de Jong & Maurice K. D. Schouten - 2005 - Philosophical Psychology 18 (4):473-486.details
|
|
The usefulness of truth: an enquiry concerning economic modelling.Simon Deichsel - 2010 - Erasmus Journal for Philosophy and Economics 3 (1):119.details
|
|
The Empirical Under-Determination Argument Against Scientific Realism for Dual Theories.Sebastian De Haro - 2021 - Erkenntnis 88 (1):117-145.details
|
|
Scientific Controversies and the Ethics of Arguing and Belief in the Face of Rational Disagreement.Xavier de Donato Rodríguez & Jesús Zamora Bonilla - 2014 - Argumentation 28 (1):39-65.details
|
|