Switch to: References

Add citations

You must login to add citations.
  1. The myth of the moral faculty: Response to Kirkby.Mark Johnson - 2013 - Philosophical Psychology (4):1-5.
    David Kirkby argues that I have misrepresented Marc Hauser's conception of a moral faculty, in a way that invalidates my chief arguments against the existence and necessity of such a faculty. The core of Kirkby's challenge is that what Hauser lists as necessary conditions for the moral faculty to do its work are not themselves components of that faculty. I argue that there is no useful way to distinguish necessary conditions of moral judgments from the alleged moral faculty itself, and (...)
    Direct download (3 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark  
  • The myth of the moral faculty: Response to Kirkby.Mark Johnson - 2014 - Philosophical Psychology 27 (4):483-487.
    Direct download (2 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark  
    		•
  • The Nature of Morals: How Universal Moral Grammar Provides the Conceptual Basis for the Universal Declaration of Human Rights.Vincent J. Carchidi - 2020 - Human Rights Review 21 (1):65-92.
    I argue that theoretical developments in the study of the Universal Declaration of Human Rights (UDHR) should occur alongside progress in moral psychology, particularly moral cognition. More specifically, I argue that Universal Moral Grammar (UMG), a model positing an innate, regulative, and universal moral faculty characterizable in terms of rules and principles, fulfills the role of the foundational model needed to usefully conceptualize the UDHR. As such, I provide a detailed account of UMG against competing models in moral psychology. Furthermore, (...)
    Direct download (2 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark  
    		•