Switch to: References

Add citations

You must login to add citations.
  1. Equational theories of fields.Amador Martin-Pizarro & Martin Ziegler - 2020 - Journal of Symbolic Logic 85 (2):828-851.
    A first-order theory is equational if every definable set is a Boolean combination of instances of equations, that is, of formulae such that the family of finite intersections of instances has the descending chain condition. Equationality is a strengthening of stability. We show the equationality of the theory of proper extensions of algebraically closed fields and of the theory of separably closed fields of arbitrary imperfection degree.
    Direct download (2 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   1 citation  
  • Theories with equational forking.Markus Junker & Ingo Kraus - 2002 - Journal of Symbolic Logic 67 (1):326-340.
    We show that equational independence in the sense of Srour equals local non-forking. We then examine so-called almost equational theories where equational independence is a symmetric relation.
    Direct download (8 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   3 citations  
  • Semi-Equational Theories.Artem Chernikov & Alex Mennen - forthcoming - Journal of Symbolic Logic:1-32.
    We introduce and study (weakly) semi-equational theories, generalizing equationality in stable theories (in the sense of Srour) to the NIP context. In particular, we establish a connection to distality via one-sided strong honest definitions; demonstrate that certain trees are semi-equational, while algebraically closed valued fields are not weakly semi-equational; and obtain a general criterion for weak semi-equationality of an expansion of a distal structure by a new predicate.
    Direct download (2 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   1 citation  
  • Comparing axiomatizations of free pseudospaces.Olaf Beyersdorff - 2009 - Archive for Mathematical Logic 48 (7):625-641.
    Independently and pursuing different aims, Hrushovski and Srour (On stable non-equational theories. Unpublished manuscript, 1989) and Baudisch and Pillay (J Symb Log 65(1):443–460, 2000) have introduced two free pseudospaces that generalize the well know concept of Lachlan’s free pseudoplane. In this paper we investigate the relationship between these free pseudospaces, proving in particular, that the pseudospace of Baudisch and Pillay is a reduct of the pseudospace of Hrushovski and Srour.
    Direct download (5 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark