Switch to: References

Add citations

You must login to add citations.
  1. Discourse or Dialogue? Habermas, the Bakhtin Circle, and the question of concrete utterances.John Michael Roberts - 2012 - Theory and Society 41 (4):395-419.
    This article argues that the Bakhtin Circle presents a more realistic theory of concrete dialogue than the theory of discourse elaborated by Habermas. The Bakhtin Circle places speech within the “concrete whole utterance” and by this phrase they mean that the study of everyday language should be analyzed through the mediations of historical social systems such as capitalism. These mediations are also characterized by a determinate set of contradictions—the capital-labor contradiction in capitalism, for example—that are reproduced in unique ways in (...)
    Direct download (5 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   3 citations  
  • A Gramscian perspective on developmental work research: Contradictions, power and the role of researchers reconsidered.Tiina Kontinen - 2013 - Outlines. Critical Practice Studies 14 (2):106-129.
    The article presents a Gramscian reading of organisational interventions within the framework of developmental work research. Developmental work research is based on Engeström’s concepts of activity system and expansive learning cycle. It utilizes the theoretical vocabulary provided by Marx and Ilyenkov and is situated in the traditions of cultural-historical and critical research. In recent years, critical commentaries have pointed to a need to reconsider questions related to transformation, contradictions and power within the approach. The Gramscian reading here suggests that the (...)
    Direct download (5 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   1 citation  
  • Where is the primary contradiction?Paulo Rocha - 2020 - Outlines. Critical Practice Studies 21 (2):06-28.
    This article reflects on the idea that there is an omnipresent primary contradiction lurking at the bottom of every activity in capitalism. In doing so, it articulates the relationship between Marxism and Activity Theory. Whilst Marx’s ideas suggest that a trademark of capitalist social formations is the way surplus is pumped out from living labour, Activity Theory posits that the dual nature of commodities is the fundamental contradiction existent among all activities. The article argues that such distinction bears a direct (...)
    Direct download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark