Switch to: References

Add citations

You must login to add citations.
  1. Against the integrative turn in bioethics: burdens of understanding.Lovro Savić & Viktor Ivanković - 2018 - Medicine, Health Care and Philosophy 21 (2):265-276.
    The advocates of Integrative Bioethics have insisted that this recently emerging project aspires to become a new stage of bioethical development, surpassing both biomedically oriented bioethics and global bioethics. We claim in this paper that if the project wants to successfully replace the two existing paradigms, it at least needs to properly address and surmount the lack of common moral vocabulary problem. This problem points to a semantic incommensurability due to cross-language communication in moral terms. This paper proceeds as follows. (...)
    Direct download (2 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark  
  • Do We Need Ethical Theory to Achieve Quality Critical Engagement in Clinical Ethics?Ainsley J. Newson & Rosalind McDougall - 2016 - American Journal of Bioethics 16 (9):43-45.
    Direct download (3 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark  
    		•
  • A MacIntyrean Critique of Theoretical Pluralism in Applied Ethics.Brandon Boesch - 2016 - American Journal of Bioethics 16 (9):41-43.
    According to the work of Alasdair MacIntyre, there is an incommensurability between different theories of normative ethics. MacIntyre’s view on the incommensurability of ethical discourse casts doubt upon the pluralistic proposal of Magelssen and colleagues, since the insights gained from the various theories will themselves be incommensurate with one another. However, since there are obvious benefits provided both by arguments for pluralism and the insights of Magelssen and colleagues, I utilize some later work of MacIntyre to offer an alternative means (...)
    Direct download (3 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark  
    		•