Switch to: References

Citations of:

Aristotle: Eudemian Ethics

Brad Inwood & Raphael Woolf (eds.)

Cambridge University Press (2012)

Add citations

You must login to add citations.

Aristotle on Deliberation and Contingency.Filip Grgic - 2018 - In Filip Grgić & Davor Pećnjak (eds.), Free Will & Action: Historical and Contemporary Perspectives. Switzerland: Springer. pp. 103-115.details The author discusses Aristotle’s notion of deliberation and shows that it differs considerably from the model of deliberation as is common in contemporary discussions of free will and moral responsibility. As opposed to the contemporary model, Aristotle’s account does not require that the deliberator has any belief (or lack thereof) concerning the availability of possible courses of action. However, the action chosen by deliberation, before it is performed, is still contingent––i.e. such that it can both be and not be done––and (...) Aristotle: Free Will and Agency in Ancient Greek and Roman Philosophy Aristotle: Voluntary and Involuntary in Ancient Greek and Roman Philosophy $48.56 new (collection) View on Amazon.com Direct download Export citation Bookmark
Explanation and Method in Eudemian Ethics I.6.Lucas Angioni - 2017 - Archai: Revista de Estudos Sobre as Origens Do Pensamento Ocidental 20:191-229.details I discuss the methodological passage in the begin- ning of Ethica Eudemia I.6 (1216b26-35), which has received attention in connection with Aristotle’s notion of dialectic and his methodology in Ethics. My central focus is not to discuss whether Aristotle is prescribing and using what has been called the method of endoxa. I will focus on how this passage coheres with the remaining parts of the same chapter, which also are advancing methodological remarks. My claim is that the meth- od of (...) Aristotle: Dialectic in Ancient Greek and Roman Philosophy Aristotle: Ethics, Misc in Ancient Greek and Roman Philosophy Aristotle: Philosophical Method, Misc in Ancient Greek and Roman Philosophy Aristotle: Philosophy of Science, Misc in Ancient Greek and Roman Philosophy Direct download (3 more) Export citation Bookmark 15 citations
Le varietà del naturalismo.Gaia Bagnati, Alice Morelli & Melania Cassan (eds.) - 2019 - Edizioni Ca' Foscari.details No categories Direct download Export citation Bookmark
Aristotle on phainomenal cognition: Accessibility and epistemological limitation.Raphael Zillig - 2019 - Manuscrito 42 (4):439-468.details According to Aristotle, phainomena or “appearances” provide the basis from which researches proceed. This shows that in spite of phainomena often corresponding to what falsely appears to be the case, there is genuine cognition through them. In this paper, I focus on two features of phainomenal cognition: accessibility and epistemological limitation. A phainomenal cognition of x is limited in the sense that there is always a stronger cognition of x to be attained. In this way, a research always aims at (...) No categories Direct download (5 more) Export citation Bookmark
Complete Life in the Eudemian Ethics.Hilde Vinje - 2023 - Apeiron: A Journal for Ancient Philosophy and Science 53 (2):299–323.details In the Eudemian Ethics II 1, 1219a34–b8, Aristotle defines happiness as ‘the activity of a complete life in accordance with complete virtue’. Most scholars interpret a complete life as a whole lifetime, which means that happiness involves virtuous activity over an entire life. This article argues against this common reading by using Aristotle’s notion of ‘activity’ (energeia) as a touchstone. It argues that happiness, according to the Eudemian Ethics, must be a complete activity that reaches its end at any and (...) Aristotle: Eudemian Ethics in Ancient Greek and Roman Philosophy Direct download (4 more) Export citation Bookmark 1 citation
Does Aristotle have a dialectical attitude in EE I 6: a negative answer.Fernando M. Mendonça - 2017 - Archai: Revista de Estudos Sobre as Origens Do Pensamento Ocidental 20:161-190.details No categories Direct download (2 more) Export citation Bookmark 1 citation
The Relation Between Logos and Thumos: An analysis of EN VII.6 1149a24–b3.Duane Long - 2022 - Rhizomata 10 (1):94-117.details At EN VII.6 1149a24-b3, Aristotle offers an argument for the conclusion that akrasia due to thumos is less shameful than akrasia due to epithumia. The reasoning in this argument is obscure, for Aristotle makes two claims in particular that are difficult to understand; first, that in some way thumos “hears” reason when it leads to akrasia, and second, that thumos responds to what it hears “as if having syllogized” to a conclusion about how to act. This paper argues that previous (...) Aristotle: Ethics, Misc in Ancient Greek and Roman Philosophy Aristotle: Eudemian Ethics in Ancient Greek and Roman Philosophy Aristotle: Nicomachean Ethics in Ancient Greek and Roman Philosophy Moral Reasoning and Motivation, Misc in Meta-Ethics Direct download (2 more) Export citation Bookmark
Aristotle on Becoming Virtuous by Doing Virtuous Actions.Marta Jimenez - 2016 - Phronesis 61 (1):3-32.details Aristotle ’s claim that we become virtuous by doing virtuous actions raises a familiar problem: How can we perform virtuous actions unless we are already virtuous? I reject deflationary accounts of the answer given in _Nicomachean Ethics_ 2.4 and argue instead that proper habituation involves doing virtuous actions with the right motive, i.e. for the sake of the noble, even though learners do not yet have virtuous dispositions. My interpretation confers continuity to habituation and explains in a non-mysterious way how (...) Aristotle: Moral Education in Ancient Greek and Roman Philosophy Direct download (4 more) Export citation Bookmark 26 citations
Two Ways of Being for an End.Jessica Gelber - 2018 - Phronesis 63 (1):64-86.details _ Source: _Volume 63, Issue 1, pp 64 - 86 Five times in the extant corpus, Aristotle refers to a distinction between two ways of being a ‘that for the sake of which’ that he sometimes marks by using genitive and dative pronouns. Commentators almost universally say that this is the distinction between an aim and beneficiary. I propose that Aristotle had a quite different distinction in mind, namely: that which holds between something and the aim or objective it is (...) Aristotle: Metaphysics in Ancient Greek and Roman Philosophy Direct download (4 more) Export citation Bookmark 5 citations
Aristotle’s contrast between episteme and doxa in its context (Posterior Analytics I.33).Lucas Angioni - 2019 - Manuscrito 42 (4):157-210.details Aristotle contrasts episteme and doxa through the key notions of universal and necessary. These notions have played a central role in Aristotle’s characterization of scientific knowledge in the previous chapters of APo. They are not spelled out in APo I.33, but work as a sort of reminder that packs an adequate characterization of scientific knowledge and thereby gives a highly specified context for Aristotle’s contrast between episteme and doxa. I will try to show that this context introduces a contrast in (...) Aristotle: Demonstration in Ancient Greek and Roman Philosophy Aristotle: Epistemology, Misc in Ancient Greek and Roman Philosophy Aristotle: Philosophy of Science, Misc in Ancient Greek and Roman Philosophy Aristotle: Posterior Analytics in Ancient Greek and Roman Philosophy Direct download (7 more) Export citation Bookmark 11 citations
Why a new edition of Aristotle’s Eudemian Ethics?Christopher Rowe - 2021 - Circe de Clásicos y Modernos 25 (2):145-153.details The present article contains the conference delivered by Prof. C.J. Rowe at the III International Ancient Philosophy Workshop.There he exposes the main guidelines of the forthcoming edition of Aristotle´s Eudemian Ethics which he has prepared for the Scriptorum Classicorum BibliothecaOxoniensis. Aristotle in Ancient Greek and Roman Philosophy Direct download Export citation Bookmark

1