Switch to: References

Add citations

You must login to add citations.
  1. Groups as Epistemic Communities: Social Forces and Affect as Antecedents to Knowledge.Miika Vähämaa - 2013 - Social Epistemology 27 (1):3 - 20.
    (2013). Groups as Epistemic Communities: Social Forces and Affect as Antecedents to Knowledge. Social Epistemology: Vol. 27, No. 1, pp. 3-20. doi: 10.1080/02691728.2012.760660.
    Direct download (4 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   3 citations  
  • A Group Epistemology is a Group Necessity: A Reply to Fallis and Mathiesen.Miika Vähämaa - 2013 - Social Epistemology 27 (1):26 - 31.
    (2013). A Group Epistemology is a Group Necessity: A Reply to Fallis and Mathiesen. Social Epistemology: Vol. 27, No. 1, pp. 26-31. doi: 10.1080/02691728.2012.760667.
    Direct download (4 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   1 citation  
  • Incommunicative Action: An Esoteric Warning About Deliberative Democracy.Geoffrey M. Vaughan - 2010 - Critical Review: A Journal of Politics and Society 22 (2-3):293-309.
    Deliberative democracy is a noble project: an attempt to make citizens philosophize. Critics of deliberative democracy usually claim either that the proposed deliberation threatens an existing moral consensus or, instead, that deliberation is impossible amid power imbalances that oppress the weak. But another problem is that combining democracy and deliberation is inherently an attempt to engage publicly in a private activity—where sensitivity to each interlocutor may require a special form of address. Can this be done? Yes, in some contexts. The (...)
    Direct download (2 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   1 citation  
  • Incommunicative Action: An Esoteric Warning About Deliberative Democracy.Geoffrey M. Vaughan - 2010 - Critical Review: A Journal of Politics and Society 22 (2):293-309.
    Deliberative democracy is a noble project: an attempt to make citizens philosophize. Critics of deliberative democracy usually claim either that the proposed deliberation threatens an existing moral consensus or, instead, that deliberation is impossible amid power imbalances that oppress the weak. But another problem is that combining democracy and deliberation is inherently an attempt to engage publicly in a private activity—where sensitivity to each interlocutor may require a special form of address. Can this be done? Yes, in some contexts. The (...)
    Direct download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   1 citation  
  • Discourse and democracy: The formal and informal bases of legitimacy in Habermas' faktizität und geltung.William Rehg & James Bohman - 1996 - Journal of Political Philosophy 4 (1):79–99.
  • Habermas, modernity and law: A bibliography.Mathieu Deflem - 1994 - Philosophy and Social Criticism 20 (4):151-166.
    Direct download (2 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark  
  • Discourse and Democracy: The Formal and Informal Bases of Legitimacy in Habermas' Faktizität und Geltung.James Bohman & William Rehg - 2006 - Journal of Political Philosophy 4 (1):79-99.
    Direct download (2 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   4 citations