In set theory without the Axiom of Choice, we consider Ingleton’s axiom which is the ultrametric counterpart of the Hahn–Banach axiom. We show that in ZFA, i.e., in the set theory without the Axiom of Choice weakened to allow “atoms,” Ingleton’s axiom does not imply the Axiom of Choice. We also prove that in ZFA, the “multiple choice” axiom implies the Krein–Milman axiom. We deduce that, in ZFA, the conjunction of the Hahn–Banach, Ingleton and Krein–Milman axioms does not imply the (...) Axiom of Choice. (shrink)

We establish that, in ZF, the statementRLT: Given a setIand a non-empty setF\documentclass[12pt]{minimal} \usepackage{amsmath} \usepackage{wasysym} \usepackage{amsfonts} \usepackage{amssymb} \usepackage{amsbsy} \usepackage{mathrsfs} \usepackage{upgreek} \setlength{\oddsidemargin}{-69pt} \begin{document}$${\mathcal{F}}$$\end{document}of non-empty elementary closed subsets of 2Isatisfying the fip, ifF\documentclass[12pt]{minimal} \usepackage{amsmath} \usepackage{wasysym} \usepackage{amsfonts} \usepackage{amssymb} \usepackage{amsbsy} \usepackage{mathrsfs} \usepackage{upgreek} \setlength{\oddsidemargin}{-69pt} \begin{document}$${\mathcal{F}}$$\end{document}has a choice function, then⋂F≠∅\documentclass[12pt]{minimal} \usepackage{amsmath} \usepackage{wasysym} \usepackage{amsfonts} \usepackage{amssymb} \usepackage{amsbsy} \usepackage{mathrsfs} \usepackage{upgreek} \setlength{\oddsidemargin}{-69pt} \begin{document}$${\bigcap\mathcal{F} \ne \emptyset}$$\end{document},which was introduced in Morillon :739–749, 2012), is equivalent to the Boolean Prime Ideal Theorem. The result provides, on one hand, an affirmative answer to Morillon’s corresponding (...) question in Morillon and, on the other hand, a negative answer—in the setting of ZFA —to the question in Morillon of whether RLT is equivalent to Rado’s selection lemma. (shrink)