Switch to: References

Citations of:

Why Hegel's concept is not the essence of things

In David Carlson (ed.), Hegel's Theory of the Subject. Palgrave-Macmillan (2005)

Add citations

You must login to add citations.
  1. Hegel’s logic of finitude.Rocío Zambrana - 2012 - Continental Philosophy Review 45 (2):213-233.
    In “Violence and Metaphysics” Jacques Derrida suggests that “the only effective position to take in order not to be enveloped by Hegel would seem to be…to consider false-infinity…irreducible.” Inversely, refuting the charge of logocentrism associated with Hegelian true infinity ( wahrhafte Unendlichkeit ) would involve showing that Hegel’s speculative logic does not establish the infinity of being exempt from the negativity of the finite. This paper takes up Derrida’s challenge, and argues that true infinity is crucial to Hegel’s understanding of (...)
    Direct download (4 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   3 citations  
  • Actuality in Hegel and Marx.Rocío Zambrana - 2019 - Hegel Bulletin 40 (1):74-91.
    No categories
    Direct download (2 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   3 citations  
  • Rethinking Maker: Hegel's Realism Revisited.George Webster - 2022 - Hegel Bulletin 44 (2):297-320.
    I provide a metaphysically realist interpretation of Hegel’sPhilosophy of Nature—one that allows us to make sense of one of the more puzzling references to nature in hisScience of Logic. I do so by affording William Maker’s under-appreciated account of Hegel’s realism more of the attention and scrutiny it deserves—not least because it involves a distinctively simple and elegant account of the famously obscure move from logic to nature in Hegel’s system. Though I point out its limitations, I claim that Maker’s (...)
    Direct download (4 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark  
  • Umjetnost kao samorefleksija. Od Hegelova kraja povijesti do Dantoova kraja umjetnosti.Marko Kardum - 2014 - Filozofska Istrazivanja 34 (3):427-443.
    Napredak umjetničkih praksi i stvaranje nove kategorije umjetničkih artefakata očekivano je doveo i do problema intuitivnog, ali i teorijskog određenja navedenih artefakata i praksi kao umjetničkih. Uvođenje do tada neumjetničkih ili uporabnih predmeta svakodnevnoga svijeta u svijet umjetnosti otvorio je rascjep u određivanju predikata biti umjetničkim djelom. Odgovor i teorijski izazov koji je uslijedio pojavio se u često osporavanoj potrebi pa i samoj mogućnosti da se umjetnost uopće definira. Čini se da, u kontekstu navedenog problema, potreba nije sporna, ali mogućnost (...)
    No categories
    Direct download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark