Switch to: References

Citations of:

The reception of cartesianism

In Peter R. Anstey (ed.), The Oxford handbook of British philosophy in the seventeenth century. Oxford, England: Oxford University Press. pp. 116 (2013)

Add citations

You must login to add citations.
  1. Edward Stillingfleet’s theological critique of Cartesian natural philosophy.Jeffrey R. Wigelsworth - 2020 - History of European Ideas 46 (8):1150-1164.
    ABSTRACT In this article I examine Edward Stillingfleet’s last published work and the critique of Rene Descartes’s natural philosophy therein which appeared in 1702 as an incomplete appendix to the revised edition of his well-known Origines Sacrae to explore the depiction of God’s power that underwrote his assessment of Cartesianism mechanical philosophy and its inclination to atheism. I consider both Stillingfleet’s characterization of God’s relationship with the creation and the contextual sources he used to support it, to show that his (...)
    No categories
    Direct download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   1 citation  
  • Philosophies cartésiennes à l'usage des étrangers: les traductions latines du Traité de physique de Rohault et de la Recherche de la vérité de Malebranche.Elena Muceni - 2017 - Rivista di Storia Della Filosofia 72 (4):641-664.
    No categories
    Direct download (2 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark  
  • English Philosophers and Scottish Academic Philosophy.Gellera Giovanni - 2017 - Journal of Scottish Philosophy 15 (2):213-231.
    This paper investigates the little-known reception of Thomas Hobbes, Henry More, Francis Bacon, Robert Boyle, Isaac Newton, and John Locke in the Scottish universities in the period 1660–1700. The fortune of the English philosophers in the Scottish universities rested on whether their philosophies were consonant with the Scots’ own philosophical agenda. Within the established Cartesian curriculum, the Scottish regents eagerly taught what they thought best in English philosophy and criticised what they thought wrong. The paper also suggests new sources and (...)
    Direct download (4 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   1 citation