Switch to: References

Add citations

You must login to add citations.
  1. The Neo‐Barthian Critique of Reinhold Niebuhr.Edmund N. Santurri - 2013 - Journal of Religious Ethics 41 (3):541-547.
    The author notes an unclarity in David Novak's defense of Reinhold Niebuhr against Stanley Hauerwas's critique and identifies some issues left unsettled in the exchange between Novak and Hauerwas over Niebuhr's ethics. Specifically, the author proposes that the Barthian-Hauerwasian communitarian rejection of Niebuhrian natural theology and natural law ignores the historical abuse of biblical theology in the German Christian response to the Nazis, fails to account for the fact of general moral revulsion against Nazism, and flirts itself with a conventionalist (...)
    Direct download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark  
  • Hauerwas's "With the Grain of the Universe" and the Barthian Outlook: A Few Observations.Roger Gustavsson - 2007 - Journal of Religious Ethics 35 (1):25 - 86.
    This article has two main divisions, the first consisting in parts 1-3, the second in parts 4-8. The purpose of the first division is to assess Hauerwas's contentions regarding what he takes to be serious debilities in modern theological culture. The objects of Hauerwas's criticism are: (1) natural theology; (2) reason as it is represented in the structure of the modern university and in the "Enlightenment Project"; and (3) liberal Protestantism--the latter particularly as it turns up, by his account, in (...)
    Direct download (2 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark  
    		•
  • The Original Risk: Overtheologizing Ethics and Undertheologizing Sin.Denis Müller - 2007 - Christian Bioethics 13 (1):7-23.
    The project of articulating a theological ethics on the basis of liturgical anthropology is bound to fail if the necessary consequence is that one has to quit the forum of critical modern rationality. The risk of Engelhardt's approach is to limit rationality to a narrow vision of reason. Sin is not to be understood as the negation of human holiness, but as the negation of divine holiness. The only way to renew theological ethics is to understand sin as the anthropological (...)
    Direct download (8 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   7 citations  
  • Hauerwas's with the grain of the universe and the Barthian outlook: A few observations.Roger Gustavsson - 2007 - Journal of Religious Ethics 35 (1):25-86.
    This article has two main divisions, the first consisting in parts 1-3, the second in parts 4-8. The purpose of the first division is to assess Hauerwas's contentions regarding what he takes to be serious debilities in modern theological culture. The objects of Hauerwas's criticism are: natural theology; reason as it is represented in the structure of the modern university and in the "Enlightenment Project"; and liberal Protestantism--the latter particularly as it turns up, by his account, in Reinhold Niebuhr's theology. (...)
    Direct download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark  
    		•