- Reconstructing Multimodal Arguments in Advertisements: Combining Pragmatics and Argumentation Theory.Fabrizio Macagno & Rosalice Botelho Wakim Souza Pinto - 2021 - Argumentation 35 (1):141-176.details
|
|
Types of dialogue and pragmatic ambiguity.Fabrizio Macagno & Sarah Bigi - 2018 - In Sarah Bigi & Fabrizio Macagno (eds.), Argumentation and Language — Linguistic, Cognitive and Discursive Explorations. Cham: Springer Verlag. pp. 191-218.details
|
|
Strategic Maneuvering with the Burden of Proof.Frans H. van Eemeren & Peter Houtlosser - 2015 - In Scott Jacobs, Sally Jackson, Frans Eemeren & Frans H. van Eemeren (eds.), Reasonableness and Effectiveness in Argumentative Discourse: Fifty Contributions to the Development of Pragma-Dialectics. Cham, Switzerland: Springer Verlag.details
|
|
Fallacies in Pragma-Dialectical Perspective.R. Grootendorst, Frans Eemeren & Frans H. van Eemeren - 2015 - In Scott Jacobs, Sally Jackson, Frans Eemeren & Frans H. van Eemeren (eds.), Reasonableness and Effectiveness in Argumentative Discourse: Fifty Contributions to the Development of Pragma-Dialectics. Cham, Switzerland: Springer Verlag. pp. 283-301.details
|
|
In What Sense Do Modern Argumentation Theories Relate to Aristotle? The Case of Pragma-Dialectics.Frans Eemeren & Frans H. van Eemeren - 2015 - In Scott Jacobs, Sally Jackson, Frans Eemeren & Frans H. van Eemeren (eds.), Reasonableness and Effectiveness in Argumentative Discourse: Fifty Contributions to the Development of Pragma-Dialectics. Cham, Switzerland: Springer Verlag. pp. 49-70.details
|
|
Fallacy and argumentational vice.Andrew Aberdein - 2014 - In Dima Mohammed & Marcin Lewinski (eds.), Virtues of argumentation: Proceedings of the 10th International Conference of the Ontario Society for the Study of Argumentation (OSSA), May 22–25, 2013. OSSA.details
|
|
Biomorphism and Models in Design.Cameron Shelley - 2015 - In Woosuk Park, Ping Li & Lorenzo Magnani (eds.), Philosophy and Cognitive Science Ii: Western & Eastern Studies. Cham: Springer Verlag.details
|
|
Inquiry: A New Paradigm for Critical Thinking.Mark Battersby (ed.) - 2018 - Windsor, Canada: Windsor Studies in Argumentation.details
|
|
Dialogues in Argumentation.Von Burg Ron - 2016 - Windsor: University of Windsor.details
|
|
Experts and Bias: When is the Interest-Based Objection to Expert Argumentation Sound? [REVIEW]Frank Zenker - 2011 - Argumentation 25 (3):355-370.details
|
|
Unphilosophical probability.Sandy L. Zabell - 1981 - Behavioral and Brain Sciences 4 (3):358-359.details
|
|
Computational Agents as a Test-Bed to Study the Philosophical Dialogue Model "DE": A Development of Mackenzie's DC.Tangming Yuan, David Moore & Alec Grierson - 2003 - Informal Logic 23 (3):263-284.details
|
|
Managing the Complexity of Dialogues in Context: A Data-Driven Discovery Method for Dialectical Reply Structures.Olena Yaskorska-Shah - 2021 - Argumentation 35 (4):551-580.details
|
|
Reasons.Larry Wright - 2019 - Topoi 38 (4):751-762.details
|
|
Reasoning and Explaining.Larry Wright - 2002 - Argumentation 16 (1):33-46.details
|
|
Rationality ideals and mentality.John Woods - 1988 - Argumentation 2 (4):419-424.details
|
|
Composition and division.John Woods & Douglas Walton - 1977 - Studia Logica 36 (4):381 - 406.details
|
|
Cohen on contraposition.N. E. Wetherick - 1981 - Behavioral and Brain Sciences 4 (3):358-358.details
|
|
Competence, performance, and ignorance.Robert W. Weisberg - 1981 - Behavioral and Brain Sciences 4 (3):356-358.details
|
|
The importance of cognitive illusions.Peter Wason - 1981 - Behavioral and Brain Sciences 4 (3):356-356.details
|
|
The Value of Genetic Fallacies.Andrew C. Ward - 2010 - Informal Logic 30 (1):1-33.details
|
|
Which of the fallacies are fallacies of relevance?Douglas N. Walton - 1992 - Argumentation 6 (2):237-250.details
|
|
Wrenching from Context: The Manipulation of Commitments.Douglas Walton & Fabrizio Macagno - 2010 - Argumentation 24 (3):283-317.details
|
|
Teleological Justification of Argumentation Schemes.Douglas Walton & Giovanni Sartor - 2013 - Argumentation 27 (2):111-142.details
|
|
The ad Hominem argument as an informal fallacy.Douglas N. Walton - 1987 - Argumentation 1 (3):317-331.details
|
|
Similarity, precedent and argument from analogy.Douglas Walton - 2010 - Artificial Intelligence and Law 18 (3):217-246.details
|
|
Searching for the Roots of the Circumstantial Ad Hominem.D. N. Walton - 2001 - Argumentation 15 (2):207-221.details
|
|
Speech Act Rules for Burden of Proof in a Modified Hamblin Dialogue System.Douglas Walton - 2011 - Informal Logic 31 (4):279-304.details
|
|
Some Artificial Intelligence Tools for Argument Evaluation: An Introduction.Douglas Walton - 2016 - Argumentation 30 (3):317-340.details
|
|
Reasoned use of expertise in argumentation.Douglas N. Walton - 1989 - Argumentation 3 (1):59-73.details
|
|
Profiles of Dialogue for Evaluating Arguments from Ignorance.Douglas Walton - 1999 - Argumentation 13 (1):53-71.details
|
|
Profiles of Dialogue for Relevance.Douglas Walton & Fabrizio Macagno - 2016 - Informal Logic 36 (4):523-562.details
|
|
Profiles of Dialogue for Amphiboly.Douglas Walton - 2020 - Informal Logic 40 (1):3-45.details
|
|
Persuasion dialogue in online dispute resolution.Douglas Walton & David M. Godden - 2005 - Artificial Intelligence and Law 13 (2):273-295.details
|
|
Plausible deniability and evasion of burden of proof.Douglas Walton - 1996 - Argumentation 10 (1):47-58.details
|
|
Philosophical basis of relatedness logic.Douglas N. Walton - 1979 - Philosophical Studies 36 (2):115 - 136.details
|
|
New directions in the logic of dialogue.Douglas N. Walton - 1984 - Synthese 58 (2):259 - 274.details
|
|
New directions in the logic of dialogue.Douglas N. Walton - 1985 - Synthese 63 (3):259 - 274.details
|
|
How to make and defend a proposal in a deliberation dialogue.Douglas Walton - 2006 - Artificial Intelligence and Law 14 (3):177-239.details
|
|
Historical Origins of Argumentum ad Consequentiam.Douglas Walton - 1999 - Argumentation 13 (3):251-264.details
|
|
Francis Bacon: Human Bias and the Four Idols. [REVIEW]Douglas Walton - 1999 - Argumentation 13 (4):385-389.details
|
|
Editor's introduction.Douglas N. Walton - 1988 - Argumentation 2 (4):393-393.details
|
|
Editor's introduction.Douglas Walton - 1994 - Argumentation 8 (3):215-216.details
|
|
Epistemic and Dialectical Models of Begging the Question.Douglas Walton - 2006 - Synthese 152 (2):237-284.details
|
|
Dialogue theory for critical thinking.Douglas N. Walton - 1989 - Argumentation 3 (2):169-184.details
|
|
Defeasible reasoning and informal fallacies.Douglas Walton - 2011 - Synthese 179 (3):377 - 407.details
|
|
Computational Dialectic and Rhetorical Invention.Douglas Walton - 2011 - AI and Society 26 (1):2011.details
|
|
Begging the question as a pragmatic fallacy.Douglas N. Walton - 1994 - Synthese 100 (1):95 - 131.details
|
|
Begging the Question in Arguments Based on Testimony.Douglas Walton - 2005 - Argumentation 19 (1):85-113.details
|
|
Burden of proof.DouglasN Walton - 1988 - Argumentation 2 (2):233-254.details
|
|