Switch to: References

Add citations

You must login to add citations.
  1. Even Risk-Averters may Love Risk.Alfred Müller & Marco Scarsini - 2002 - Theory and Decision 52 (1):81-99.
    A decision maker bets on the outcomes of a sequence of coin-tossings. At the beginning of the game the decision maker can choose one of two coins to play the game. This initial choice is irreversible. The coins can be biased and the player is uncertain about the nature of one (or possibly both) coin(s). If the player is an expected-utility maximizer, her choice of the coin will depend on different elements: the nature of the game (namely, whether she can (...)
    Direct download (4 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark  
  • Valuing Others’ Information under Imperfect Expectations: A Cross-Individual Perspective on Harmful Information and Stock Market Price Reactions.Hagen Lindstädt - 2007 - Theory and Decision 62 (4):335-353.
    Sometimes we believe that others receive harmful information. However, Marschak’s value of information framework always assigns non-negative value under expected utility: it starts from the decision maker’s beliefs – and one can never anticipate information’s harmfulness for oneself. The impact of decision makers’ capabilities to process information and of their expectations remains hidden behind the individual and subjective perspective Marschak’s framework assumes. By introducing a second decision maker as a point of reference, this paper introduces a way for evaluating others’ (...)
    Direct download (4 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark