Switch to: References

Citations of:

Kant's Non-Prudential Duty of Beneficence

In Ralph Schumacher, Rolf-Peter Horstmann & Volker Gerhardt (eds.), Kant Und Die Berliner Aufklärung: Akten des Ix. Internationalen Kant-Kongresses. Bd. I: Hauptvorträge. Bd. Ii: Sektionen I-V. Bd. Iii: Sektionen Vi-X: Bd. Iv: Sektionen Xi-Xiv. Bd. V: Sektionen Xv-Xviii. De Gruyter. pp. 211-219 (2001)

Add citations

You must login to add citations.
  1. Can Positive Duties Be Derived From Kant’s Categorical Imperative?Michael Yudanin - 2015 - Ethical Theory and Moral Practice 18 (3):595-614.
    Kant’s moral philosophy usually considers two types of duties: negative duties that prohibit certain actions and positive duties commanding action. With that, Kant insists on deriving all morality from reason alone. Such is the Categorical Imperative that Kant lays at the basis of ethics. Yet while negative duties can be derived from the Categorical Imperative and thus from reason, the paper argues that this is not the case with positive duties. After answering a number of attempts to derive positive duties (...)
    Direct download (2 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark  
  • Kant-Bibliographie 2001.Margit Ruffing - 2003 - Kant-Studien 94 (4):474-528.
    Direct download (2 more)  
    Translate
     
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   1 citation  
  • Is Kantian Ethics Self-Refuting?Joshua Gladgow - 2008 - Journal of Ethics and Social Philosophy 2 (3):1-6.
    Direct download (7 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark