Switch to: References

Citations of:

The concepts of psychiatry: a pluralistic approach to the mind and mental illness

Baltimore: Johns Hopkins University Press (2007)

Add citations

You must login to add citations.
  1. On the ontological assumptions of the medical model of psychiatry: philosophical considerations and pragmatic tasks. [REVIEW]Tejas Patil & James Giordano - 2010 - Philosophy, Ethics, and Humanities in Medicine 5:3.
    A common theme in the contemporary medical model of psychiatry is that pathophysiological processes are centrally involved in the explanation, evaluation, and treatment of mental illnesses. Implied in this perspective is that clinical descriptors of these pathophysiological processes are sufficient to distinguish underlying etiologies. Psychiatric classification requires differentiation between what counts as normality (i.e.- order), and what counts as abnormality (i.e.- disorder). The distinction(s) between normality and pathology entail assumptions that are often deeply presupposed, manifesting themselves in statements about what (...)
    Direct download (13 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   12 citations  
  • Nosologomania: DSM & Karl Jaspers' Critique of Kraepelin.S. Nassir Ghaemi - 2009 - Philosophy, Ethics, and Humanities in Medicine 4:10.
    Emil Kraepelin's nosology has been reinvented, for better or worse. In the United States, the rise of the neo-Kraepelinian nosology of DSM-III resuscitated Kraepelin's work but also differed from many of his ideas, especially his overtly biological ontology. This neo-Kraepelinian system has led to concerns regarding overdiagnosis of psychiatric syndromes (.
    Direct download (10 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   5 citations  
  • On the autonomy of the concept of disease in psychiatry.Thomas Schramme - 2013 - Frontiers in Psychology 4:1-9.
  • The philosophies of psychiatry: empirical perspectives. [REVIEW]Alan S. G. Ralston - 2013 - Medicine, Health Care and Philosophy 16 (3):399-406.
    The past two decades have seen a surge in cross-disciplinary work in philosophy and psychiatry. Much of this work is necessarily abstract whilst those working in the area are aware of the necessity of relating the theoretical and conceptual work to the vagaries of day-to-day practice. But given the diverse methods and aims of philosophy and psychiatry, crossing the ‘communication gap’ between the two disciplines is easier said than done. In this article different methods of bridging this gap are presented (...)
    Direct download (3 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   2 citations  
  • Letter to the Editor.Ronald Pies - 2005 - Philosophical Practice 1 (2):75-76.
    (2005). Letter to the Editor. Philosophical Practice: Vol. 1, No. 2, pp. 75-76.
    No categories
    Direct download (2 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark  
  • Letter to the Editor.Ronald Pies - 2005 - Philosophical Practice: Journal of the American Philosophical Practitioners Association 1 (2):75-76.
    No categories
    Direct download (2 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark  
  • DSM diagnosis and beyond: on the need for a hermeneutically-informed biopsychosocial framework. [REVIEW]Paul Healy - 2011 - Medicine, Health Care and Philosophy 14 (2):163-175.
    While often dubbed “the bible of contemporary psychiatry” and widely hailed as providing “a benchmark” for the profession, on closer inspection the DSM is seen to be shot through with philosophical assumptions that restrict its theoretical cogency and limit it clinical efficacy. Hence, in the interests of enhanced patient-care it is important to think critically about the DSM, with a view to maximising its diagnostic strengths while minimising its weaknesses. The critical analysis undertaken in the present paper underscores the importance (...)
    Direct download (3 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark  
  • ‘Missing persons’: technical terminology as a barrier in psychiatry.Ciaran Clarke - 2012 - Medicine, Health Care and Philosophy 15 (1):23-30.
    Several fields contributing to psychiatric advances, such as psychology, biology, and the humanities, have not yet met to produce a cohesive and integrated picture of human function and dysfunction, strength and vulnerability, etc., despite advances in their own areas. The failure may have its roots in a disagreement on what we mean by the human person and his or her relationship with the world, for which the incommensurate language of these disciplines may be partly to blame. Turns taken by western (...)
    Direct download (4 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark  
  • Philosophy of psychiatry.Dominic Murphy - 2010 - Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy.