Switch to: References

Citations of:

The justification of morality

Philosophical Studies 53 (2):245 - 262 (1988)

Add citations

You must login to add citations.
  1. Method, Morality and the Impossibility of Legal Positivism.Stuart Toddington - 1996 - Ratio Juris 9 (3):283-299.
    The dispute between Legal Positivists (eg, Hart) and Natural Lawyers (e.g., Finnis) concerns the existence or otherwise of a necessary (conceptual) connection between law and morality. Legal Positivists such as Hart deny this connection and assert the merely contingent relationship of law and morals. However, it can be demonstrated that implicit in the valid sociological method of concept formation of post‐Austinian Positivists are interpretative or ideal‐typical models of the practical rationality of the legal enterprise which are not, and cannot possibly (...)
    Direct download (2 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   2 citations  
  • 20 Years of Moral Epistemology: A Bibliography.Walter Sinnott-Armstrong - 1991 - Southern Journal of Philosophy 29 (S1):217-229.
    Direct download (3 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark  
  • The human right to subsistence.Alejandra Mancilla - 2019 - Philosophy Compass 14 (9):e12618.
    That there is a human right to subsistence is a basic assumption for most moral and political theorists interested in the problem of global poverty, but it is not one exempt from controversy. In this article, I examine four justifications for this right and suggest that it takes the form of a claim, that is, a right which creates correlative duties on others who are then taken to be the main agents in its fulfillment. I point to some criticisms made (...)
    No categories
    Direct download (2 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark  
  • Is Cultural Pluralism Relevant to Moral Knowledge?Alan Gewirth - 1994 - Social Philosophy and Policy 11 (1):22-43.
    Cultural pluralism is both a fact and a norm. It is a fact that our world, and indeed our society, are marked by a large diversity of cultures delineated in terms of race, class, gender, ethnicity, religion, ideology, and other partly interpenetrating variables. This fact raises the normative question of whether, or to what extent, such diversities should be recognized or even encouraged in policies concerning government, law, education, employment, the family, immigration, and other important areas of social concern.
    Direct download (6 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   12 citations  
  • Years of moral epistemology: A bibliography.Laura Donohue & Walter Sinnott-Armstrong - 1991 - Southern Journal of Philosophy 29 (S1):217-229.
    Direct download (3 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark  
  • Legal Theory and Dialectically Contingent Justifications for the Principle of Generic Consistency.Deryck Beyleveld - 1996 - Ratio Juris 9 (1):15-41.
    It is argued that accepting that there are human rights, or that there are categorically binding requirements of any kind on action, logically requires accepting the PGC (Principle of Generic Consistency) as the supreme criterion of practical reasonableness.Consequently, all legal systems that recognise human rights (hence, the English legal system), all who view law as a matter of obligation, and all who consider that there are categorically binding requirements on action, must take the PGC to be a necessary criterion of (...)
    Direct download (2 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   5 citations  
  • The Constitutionalist Debate: A Sceptical Take.Kyle Murray - unknown
    The constitutionalist debate - over where decision-making power in society should lie, and how it should be exercised - is one which is of fundamental importance not only in academia and constitutional theory, but in society generally. The main aim of this thesis is to critically examine the current debate from a particular, sceptical philosophical perspective - one which questions the possibility of convincingly defending moral premises. This controversial perspective, which goes to the heart of debates over moral realism, objectivity, (...)
    Direct download (2 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark