Switch to: References

Add citations

You must login to add citations.
  1. The Origins and Consequences of Patient Autonomy: A 25-Year Retrospective. [REVIEW]David J. Rothman - 2001 - Health Care Analysis 9 (3):255-264.
    This essay explores the evolution of the tension between the principles of autonomy and beneficence in American health care over the past several decades. In retrospect it is clear that the social movements of the 1960s and 70s set the tone and the goals for the emergence of a new emphasis on patient autonomy. Indeed, the impact of civil liberties-minded lawyers on the promotion of a commitment to autonomy is far more vital than the term “bioethics” commonly suggests. Tracing the (...)
    Direct download (4 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   9 citations  
  • Truce on the Battlefield: A Proposal for a Different Approach to Medical Informed Consent.August Piper - 1994 - Journal of Law, Medicine and Ethics 22 (4):301-313.
    What is informed consent in medicine? For more than a generation, this deceptively simple question has vexed the law, discomfited medicine, and generated much inspired, provocative, and even contentious commentary.The question has also spawned several lawsuits. On one side stand patients who claim that, at the time of consent, they were ignorant of a particular risk; who state that, with more or different information, they would have chosen a different treatment; and who argue that, because of an adverse outcome, they (...)
    Direct download (2 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark  
  • Truce on the Battlefield: A Proposal for a Different Approach to Medical Informed Consent.August Piper - 1994 - Journal of Law, Medicine and Ethics 22 (4):301-313.
    What is informed consent in medicine? For more than a generation, this deceptively simple question has vexed the law, discomfited medicine, and generated much inspired, provocative, and even contentious commentary.The question has also spawned several lawsuits. On one side stand patients who claim that, at the time of consent, they were ignorant of a particular risk; who state that, with more or different information, they would have chosen a different treatment; and who argue that, because of an adverse outcome, they (...)
    Direct download (2 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark