Switch to: References

Citations of:

A Further Reply to Noonan

Analysis 47 (4):204 - 207 (1987)

Add citations

You must login to add citations.
  1. Fission, Fusion and Intrinsic Facts.Katherine Hawley - 2005 - Philosophy and Phenomenological Research 71 (3):602-621.
    Closest-continuer or best-candidate accounts of persistence seem deeply unsatisfactory, but it’s hard to say why. The standard criticism is that such accounts violate the ‘only a and b’ rule, but this criticism merely highlights a feature of the accounts without explaining why the feature is unacceptable. Another concern is that such accounts violate some principle about the supervenience of persistence facts upon local or intrinsic facts. But, again, we do not seem to have an independent justification for this supervenience claim. (...)
    Direct download (5 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   11 citations  
  • Best‐Candidate Theories and Identity: Reply to Brennan.B. J. Garrett - 1988 - Inquiry: An Interdisciplinary Journal of Philosophy 31 (1):79 – 85.
    This note criticizes Andrew Brennan's attempt to defend best?candidate theories of the identity of artefacts over time against certain now familiar objections. Adoption of a mereological conception of individuals does not, in itself, provide the means for a satisfactory response to objections of Wiggins and Noonan (some of which are anyway ill?focused). The way forward consists in recognizing that the consequences of best?candidate theories which have been thought objectionable (in particular, commitment to the extrinsicness of identity) do not violate the (...)
    Direct download (3 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   3 citations