Switch to: References

Citations of:

An overview of spinoza'sehics

Synthese 37 (1):67 - 106 (1978)

Add citations

You must login to add citations.
  1. Spinoza’s Substance Monism.Yakir Levin - 2012 - History of Philosophy & Logical Analysis 15 (1):368-386.
    In Spinoza’s substance monism, radically different attributes constitute the essence of one and the same substance qua a strongly unified whole. Showing how this is possible poses a formidable Cartesian challenge to Spinoza’s metaphysics. In this paper I suggest a reconstruction of Spinoza’s notion of substance that meets this challenge and explains a major feature of this notion. I then show how this reconstruction can be used to resolve two fundamental problems of the Cartesian framework that pertain to Spinoza’s metaphysics. (...)
    Direct download (3 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   2 citations  
  • Spinoza on Essences, Universals, and Beings of Reason.Karolina Hübner - 2015 - Pacific Philosophical Quarterly 96 (2):58-88.
    The article proposes a new solution to the long-standing problem of the universality of essences in Spinoza's ontology. It argues that, according to Spinoza, particular things in nature possess unique essences, but that these essences coexist with more general, mind-dependent species-essences, constructed by finite minds on the basis of similarities that obtain among the properties of formally-real particulars. This account provides the best fit both with the textual evidence and with Spinoza's other metaphysical and epistemological commitments. The article offers new (...)
    Direct download (2 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   20 citations  
  • Spinoza on Essences, Universals, and Beings of Reason.Karolina Hübner - 2015 - Pacific Philosophical Quarterly 97 (1):58-88.
    The article proposes a new solution to the long-standing problem of the universality of essences in Spinoza's ontology. It argues that, according to Spinoza, particular things in nature possess unique essences, but that these essences coexist with more general, mind-dependent species-essences, constructed by finite minds on the basis of similarities that obtain among the properties of formally-real particulars. This account provides the best fit both with the textual evidence and with Spinoza's other metaphysical and epistemological commitments. The article offers new (...)
    Direct download (2 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   19 citations  
  • Was Spinoza fooled by the ontological argument?Joel I. Friedman - 1982 - Philosophia 11 (3-4):307-344.
  • The natural God: A God even an atheist can believe in.Joel I. Friedman - 1986 - Zygon 21 (3):369-388.
    . In this paper, I attempt to dissolve the theism/atheism boundary. In the first part, I consider last things, according to mainstream science. In the second part, I define the Natural God as the Force of Nature—evolving, unifying, maximizing—and consider Its relation to last things. Finally, I discuss our knowledge of the Natural God and Its relevance to our personal lives. I argue that we can know the Natural God through scientific reason combined with global intuition, and that this knowledge, (...)
    Direct download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   1 citation  
  • Spinoza's problem of “other minds”.Joel I. Friedman - 1983 - Synthese 57 (1):99 - 126.
  • How the finite follows from the infinite in Spinoza's metaphysical system.Joel Friedman - 1986 - Synthese 69 (3):371 - 407.