The aim of this paper is to discuss how the image of the artist has formed in Western culture and how digital art may shed light on some of its internal contradictions, if not perhaps even help us overcome them. Firstly, I take into consideration the Jewish and Christian tradition according to which the image of God as Creator may play the role of the archetypal artist, of whom the human artist is a sort of copy and imitator – an (...) idea that fully established itself during the Renaissance and even now widely influences the image of the creative artist, whom is commonly endowed with an almost absolute subjectivity able to derive from her boundless spontaneity everything is needed for the making of the work of art. Next to the image of God as Creator I focus on the influence exerted by the Platonic myth of the Demiurge, the divine craftsman who, trusting its own ability and insight, shapes a given matter according to a preexisting model it contemplates. It will then be shown how the image of the Demiurge might temper the absoluteness proper to the notion of the artist deriving from the image of God as Creator and, therefore, how it might help rediscover the dimension of historicity and conditionedness that is inseparable from human artistic creativity, even though it has been strongly downplayed and despised. Finally, I argue that the philosophical study of digital art – particularly of computational creativity and remix – may offer a precious occasion for shedding new light on the objective and conditioned elements of artistic creativity and, as such, may lead the way towards a reconfiguration of the image of the artist (and of the many concepts connected to it) not under the absolute sign of God as Creator, but rather under the historical aegis of the Demiurge. (shrink)