Citations of:
Dear Prudence: the nature and normativity of prudential discourse
Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press (2021)
Add citations
You must login to add citations.
|
|
|
No categories |
|
|
Moral error theorists often respond to the epistemic companions in guilt strategy by adopting the Disparity Response: reject the putative parity between moral and epistemic reasons and claim that though the former are irreducibly normative, the latter aren’t. I argue such a response fails. Expanding on Das’ Australas J Philos 95:58–69, work I present a master argument against Disparity Responses: the arguments moral error theorists use to advance their conceptual claim apply in the epistemic domain also. This prohibits the error (...) |
