Switch to: References

Add citations

You must login to add citations.
  1. The Quest for a Responsible Responsibility Test: Norwegian Insanity Law After Breivik.Michael S. Moore - 2015 - Criminal Law and Philosophy 9 (4):645-693.
    The Breivik case in Norway has motivated a reassessment of Norwegian insanity law by the Norwegian government. Because Norway since 2002 has utilized a “medical model” for legal insanity—a model according to which the legal excuse of insanity is identified with some medical concept such as psychosis—the Norwegian reexamination of its law is not without interest throughout the world. In this paper, I utilize the Anglo-American experience with different medical models for insanity to assess the current Norwegian law on insanity. (...)
    Direct download (2 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   8 citations  
  • From being unaccountable to suffering from severe mental disorder and (possibly) back once again to being unaccountable.Christer Svennerlind - 2015 - Dialogues in Philosophy, Mental and Neuro Sciences 8 (2):45-58.
    From 1965, the Swedish penal law does not require accountability as a condition for criminal responsibility. Instead, severely mentally disordered offenders are sentenced to forensic psychiatric care. The process that led to the present legislation had its origins in a critique of the concept of accountability that was first launched 50 years earlier by the founding father of Swedish forensic psychiatry, Olof Kinberg. The concept severe mental disorder is part of the Criminal Code as well as the Compulsory Mental Act. (...)
    Direct download (2 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark