Switch to: References

Citations of:

Can science explain mysticism?

Religious Studies 35 (2):213-227 (1999)

Add citations

You must login to add citations.
  1. Near-Death Experiences are Not Evidence for Either Atheism or Theism.Keith Augustine - 2019 - In Graham Oppy & Joseph W. Koterski (eds.), Theism and Atheism: Opposing Viewpoints in Philosophy. Farmington Hills: MacMillan Reference. pp. 594-596.
    The failure to secure replicable positive results in near-death experience (NDE) target-identification experiments does not establish the nonexistence of any spiritual realms, but it does serve to substantially challenge positive arguments in favor of the existence of spiritual realms from NDE reports. For if veridical paranormal perception occurs during out-of-body experiences (OBEs) or NDEs, why the failure to find it in all of the controlled experiments that have been undertaken to document it thus far? Various explanations can be put forward, (...)
    Direct download (2 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   1 citation  
  • Evaluating the Fales/Gellman debate on the epistemic status of mystical religious experiences.Leland R. Harper - 2014 - International Journal of Philosophy and Theology 75 (1):55-73.
    From the mid 1990s to the early 2000s there has been a debate between Jerome Gellman and Evan Fales regarding the epistemic status of mystical religious experience. Gellman argues that mystical religious experiences provide some justification for the belief that God exists when taken in conjunction with a variety of other experiential evidence. Fales takes a naturalistic approach and argues that instances of mystical theistic experiences are only tools by which the mystic attempts to gain greater social status. In this (...)
    Direct download (2 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   1 citation