Switch to: References

Add citations

You must login to add citations.
  1. Introduction to "Linguistic Justice and Analytic Philosophy".Filippo Contesi & Enrico Terrone - 2018 - Philosophical Papers 47 (1):1-20.
    In recent years, increasing attention has been devoted to the underrepresentation, exclusion or outright discrimination experienced by women and members of other visible minority groups in academic philosophy. Much of this debate has focused on the state of contemporary Anglophone philosophy, which is dominated by the tradition of analytic philosophy. Moreover, there is growing interest in academia and society more generally for issues revolving around linguistic justice and linguistic discrimination (sometimes called ‘linguicism’ or ‘languagism’) (see e.g. Van Parijs 2011). Globalization (...)
    Direct download (5 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   7 citations  
  • The Philosophical Debate on Linguistic Bias: A Critical Perspective.Uwe Peters - forthcoming - Philosophical Psychology.
    Drawing on empirical findings, a number of philosophers have recently argued that people who use English as a foreign language may face a linguistic bias in academia in that they or their contributions may be perceived more negatively than warranted because of their English. I take a critical look at this argument. I first distinguish different phenomena that may be conceptualized as linguistic bias but that should be kept separate to avoid overgeneralizations. I then examine a range of empirical studies (...)
    Direct download (3 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark  
  • On intellectual diversity and differences that may not make a difference.Kristie Dotson - 2018 - Ethics and Education 13 (1):123-140.
    Calls for diversity in higher education have been ongoing for, at least, a century. Today, the diversity movement in higher education is in danger of being co-opted in the US by a move to make ‘intellectual diversity,’ i.e. the diversity of political opinion, on par with the cultural and historical diversity that one finds within differently racialized populations. Intellectual diversity is thought to track different modes of thinking between conservatives and progressives that need policy interventions to promote and protect. Here (...)
    Direct download (2 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   2 citations  
  • Academic Migration, Linguistic Justice, and Epistemic Injustice.Amandine Catala - 2021 - Wiley: Journal of Political Philosophy 30 (3):324-346.
    Journal of Political Philosophy, Volume 30, Issue 3, Page 324-346, September 2022.
    No categories
    Direct download (4 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   8 citations  
  • Academic excellence and structural epistemic injustice: Toward a more just epistemic economy in philosophy.Amandine Catala - forthcoming - Journal of Social Philosophy.
    Journal of Social Philosophy, EarlyView.
    Direct download (4 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   4 citations  
  • Foreigners and Inclusion in Academia.Saray Ayala-López - 2018 - Hypatia 33 (2):325-342.
    This article discusses the category of foreigner in the context of academia. In the first part I explore this category and its philosophical significance. A quick look at the literature reveals that this category needs more attention in analyses of dimensions of privilege and disadvantage. Foreignness has peculiarities that demarcate it from other categories of identity, and it intersects with them in complicated ways. Devoting more attention to it would enable addressing issues affecting foreigners in academia that go commonly unnoticed. (...)
    Direct download (3 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   5 citations  
  • Weak Scientism Defended Once More: A Reply to Wills.Moti Mizrahi - 2018 - Social Epistemology Review and Reply Collective 7 (6):41-50.
    Bernard Wills (2018) joins Christopher Brown (2017, 2018) in criticizing my defense of Weak Scientism (Mizrahi 2017a, 2017b, 2018a). Unfortunately, it seems that Wills did not read my latest defense of Weak Scientism carefully, nor does he cite any of the other papers in my exchange with Brown.
    Direct download (2 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   2 citations