Switch to: References

Add citations

You must login to add citations.
  1. A Case for Machine Ethics in Modeling Human-Level Intelligent Agents.Robert James M. Boyles - 2018 - Kritike 12 (1):182–200.
    This paper focuses on the research field of machine ethics and how it relates to a technological singularity—a hypothesized, futuristic event where artificial machines will have greater-than-human-level intelligence. One problem related to the singularity centers on the issue of whether human values and norms would survive such an event. To somehow ensure this, a number of artificial intelligence researchers have opted to focus on the development of artificial moral agents, which refers to machines capable of moral reasoning, judgment, and decision-making. (...)
    Direct download (4 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   2 citations  
  • The Consequential Conception of Doxastic Responsibility.Anne Https://Orcidorg Meylan - 2016 - Theoria 83 (1):4-28.
    We are occasionally responsible for our beliefs. But is this doxastic responsibility analogous to any non‐attitudinal form of responsibility? What I shall call the consequential conception of doxastic responsibility holds that the kind of responsibility that we have for our beliefs is indeed analogous to the kind of responsibility that we have for the consequences of our actions. This article does two things, both with the aim of defending this somewhat unsophisticated but intuitive view of doxastic responsibility. First, it emphasizes (...)
    No categories
    Direct download (3 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   6 citations  
  • The Consequential Conception of Doxastic Responsibility.Anne Https://Orcidorg Meylan - 2016 - Theoria 82 (4):4-28.
    We are occasionally responsible for our beliefs. But is this doxastic responsibility analogous to any non-attitudinal form of responsibility? What I shall call the consequential conception of doxastic responsibility holds that the kind of responsibility that we have for our beliefs is indeed analogous to the kind of responsibility that we have for the consequences of our actions. This article does two things, both with the aim of defending this somewhat unsophisticated but intuitive view of doxastic responsibility. First, it emphasizes (...)
    Direct download (4 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   13 citations  
  • On the Nature of Belief in Pluralistic Ignorance.Marco Antonio Joven-Romero - 2018 - Contemporary Pragmatism 15 (1):23-45.
    I apply recent research on the links between belief, truth and pragmatism based on Williams statement that “beliefs aim at truth,” to the phenomenon of pluralistic ignorance, in which agents act contrary to their private beliefs because they believe that other agents believe the contrary. I consider three positions; an epistemic position, a pragmatic position, and a third position coordinating the first two. I apply them to pluralistic ignorance while considering the recent study of Bjerring, Hansend and Pedersen. I conclude (...)
    No categories
    Direct download (4 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark  
    		•
  • Do We Need Reasons for the Normativity of Belief?Marco A. Joven-Romero - 2018 - Kritike 12 (1):162-200.
    No categories
    Direct download (2 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark  
    		•
  • Belief and pluralistic ignorance.Marco Antonio Joven Romero - 2020 - Filosofia Unisinos 21 (3):260-267.
    Pluralistic ignorance is usually analyzed in terms of social norms. Recently, Bjerring, Hansen and Pedersen describe and define this phenomenon in terms of beliefs, actions and evidence. Here I apply a basic epistemic approach to belief – believers consider their beliefs to be true –, a basic pragmatic approach to belief – beliefs are useful for believers – and a mixed epistemic-pragmatic approach – believers consider their believes to be true and such considerations are useful – to pluralistic ignorance phenomena. (...)
    No categories
    Direct download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark  
    		•
  • Replies: on norms of belief and knowledge.Pascal Engel - 2017 - Synthese 194 (5):1555-1564.
    These replies to commentators on my work focus on the nature of epistemic norms, on the nature of truth and on the nature and value of knowledge. A normative account of belief and knowledge is committed to substantial and objective epistemic norms. But not everyone agrees on their form. I try here to reply to some doubts raised by my critics.
    No categories
    Direct download (2 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   1 citation  
  • Bibliografía Hispánica de filosofía elenco 2014.Javier Ramos - 2014 - Pensamiento 70 (264):628-668.
    Para la redacción del elenco se han tenido en cuenta las publicaciones de filosofía durante el año 2013. Los fondos principales de referencia han sido los de la Biblioteca de la Universidad Pontificia Comillas. El criterio lingüístico ha sido el de incluir todas las publicaciones en castellano y lenguas cooficiales de España, en cualquier revista de cualquier país. Por otro lado, hemos registrado los artículos en idiomas no oficiales de España cuando éstos aparecen en publicaciones españolas o hispanoamericanas. Agradeceremos en (...)
    No categories
    Direct download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark  
    		•