Switch to: References

Add citations

You must login to add citations.
  1. Bayesian reverse-engineering considered as a research strategy for cognitive science.Carlos Zednik & Frank Jäkel - 2016 - Synthese 193 (12):3951-3985.
    Bayesian reverse-engineering is a research strategy for developing three-level explanations of behavior and cognition. Starting from a computational-level analysis of behavior and cognition as optimal probabilistic inference, Bayesian reverse-engineers apply numerous tweaks and heuristics to formulate testable hypotheses at the algorithmic and implementational levels. In so doing, they exploit recent technological advances in Bayesian artificial intelligence, machine learning, and statistics, but also consider established principles from cognitive psychology and neuroscience. Although these tweaks and heuristics are highly pragmatic in character and (...)
    Direct download (4 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   21 citations  
  • Troubles with Bayesianism: An introduction to the psychological immune system.Eric Mandelbaum - 2018 - Mind and Language 34 (2):141-157.
    A Bayesian mind is, at its core, a rational mind. Bayesianism is thus well-suited to predict and explain mental processes that best exemplify our ability to be rational. However, evidence from belief acquisition and change appears to show that we do not acquire and update information in a Bayesian way. Instead, the principles of belief acquisition and updating seem grounded in maintaining a psychological immune system rather than in approximating a Bayesian processor.
    Direct download (3 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   44 citations  
  • Throwing out the Bayesian baby with the optimal bathwater: Response to Endress.Michael C. Frank - 2013 - Cognition 128 (3):417-423.
  • Statistical learning and memory.Ansgar D. Endress, Lauren K. Slone & Scott P. Johnson - 2020 - Cognition 204 (C):104346.
    Direct download (2 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   1 citation  
  • In defense of epicycles: Embracing complexity in psychological explanations.Ansgar D. Endress - 2023 - Mind and Language 38 (5):1208-1237.
    Is formal simplicity a guide to learning in humans, as simplicity is said to be a guide to the acceptability of theories in science? Does simplicity determine the difficulty of various learning tasks? I argue that, similarly to how scientists sometimes preferred complex theories when this facilitated calculations, results from perception, learning and reasoning suggest that formal complexity is generally unrelated to what is easy to learn and process by humans, and depends on assumptions about available representational and processing primitives. (...)
    No categories
    Direct download (2 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark  
  • How are Bayesian models really used? Reply to Frank.Ansgar D. Endress - 2014 - Cognition 130 (1):81-84.
  • Surprisingly rational: Probability theory plus noise explains biases in judgment.Fintan Costello & Paul Watts - 2014 - Psychological Review 121 (3):463-480.
    Direct download (5 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   16 citations  
  • Nothing new under the sun, or the moon, or both.Luca L. Bonatti, Paolo Cherubini & Carlo Reverberi - 2015 - Frontiers in Human Neuroscience 9.