Switch to: References

Add citations

You must login to add citations.
  1. Truth and objectivity in perspectivism.R. Lanier Anderson - 1998 - Synthese 115 (1):1-32.
    I investigate the consequences of Nietzsche's perspectivism for notions of truth and objectivity, and show how the metaphor of visual perspective motivates an epistemology that avoids self-referential difficulties. Perspectivism's claim that every view is only one view, applied to itself, is often supposed to preclude the perspectivist's ability to offer reasons for her epistemology. Nietzsche's arguments for perspectivism depend on “internal reasons”, which have force not only in their own perspective, but also within the standards of alternative perspectives. Internal reasons (...)
    Direct download (5 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   32 citations  
  • آیا ارجاع متعین به ساحت الهی ممکن است؟.حامد قدیری - 2021 - پژوهشنامه فلسفه دین 18 (2):97-118.
    یکی از چالش‌های حوزۀ زبان دینی به امکانِ جمع میان فرض تعالی و فرض ارجاع متعارف دینی برمی‌گردد. فرض تعالی مدعی است که ساحت الهی/مطلق به طور کامل از ساحت بشری/ممکن منفک است. فرض ارجاع متعارف دینی نیز مدعی است که می‌توان به ساحت الهی/مطلق به شکل متعینی ارجاع داد. تردید در امکان جمعِ میان این دو از آنجا می‌آید که گویا مدعایی در ذهن هست که «اگر ساحتِ الهی/مطلق، به طور کامل از ساحتِ بشری/ممکن منفک باشد، آنگاه نمی‌توان به (...)
    No categories
    Direct download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark  
  • Putnam, Truth and Informal Logic.Jeffrey L. Kasser & Daniel H. Cohen - 2002 - Philosophica 70 (1):85-108.
  • Pragmatism, Truth and Response-Dependence.Andrew Howat - 2005 - Facta Philosophica 7 (2):231-253.
    Mark Johnston claims the pragmatist theory of truth is inconsistent with the way we actually employ and talk about that concept. He is, however, sympathetic enough to attempt to rescue its respectable core using ‘response-dependence’, a revisionary form of which he advocates as a method for clarifying various philosophically significant concepts. But Johnston has misrepresented pragmatism; it does not require rescuing, and as I show here, his ‘missing explanation argument’ against pragmatism therefore fails. What Johnston and other critics including Putnam (...)
    Direct download (3 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   3 citations  
  • Putnam, Context, and Ontology.Steven Gross - 2004 - Canadian Journal of Philosophy 34 (4):507 - 553.
    When a debate seems intractable, with little agreement as to how one might proceed towards a resolution, it is understandable that philosophers should consider whether something might be amiss with the debate itself. Famously in the last century, philosophers of various stripes explored in various ways the possibility that at least certain philosophical debates are in some manner deficient in sense. Such moves are no longer so much in vogue. For one thing, the particular ways they have been made have (...)
    Direct download (6 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   7 citations  
  • Putnam, realism and truth.Janet Folina - 1995 - Synthese 103 (2):141--52.
    There are several distinct components of the realist anti-realist debate. Since each side in the debate has its disadvantages, it is tempting to try to combine realist theses with anti-realist theses in order to obtain a better, more moderate position. Putnam attempts to hold a realist concept of truth, yet he rejects realist metaphysics and realist semantics. He calls this view internal realism. Truth is realist on this picture for it is objective, rather than merely intersubjective, and eternal. Putnam introduces (...)
    Direct download (5 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   1 citation  
  • Is Putnam's causal theory of meaning compatible with internal realism?Valer Ambrus - 1999 - Journal for General Philosophy of Science / Zeitschrift für Allgemeine Wissenschaftstheorie 30 (1):1-16.
    Putnam originally developed his causal theory of meaning in order to support scientific realism and reject the notion of incommensurability. Later he gave up this position and adopted instead what he called ‘internal realism’, but apparently without changing his mind on topics related to his former philosophy of language. The question must arise whether internal realism, which actually is a species of antirealism, is compatible with the causal theory of meaning. In giving an answer I begin with an analysis of (...)
    Direct download (5 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark  
  • The rise and fall of computational functionalism.Oron Shagrir - 2005 - In Yemima Ben-Menahem (ed.), Hilary Putnam (Contemporary Philosophy in Focus). Cambridge University Press.
  • The face of perception.Charles S. Travis - 2005 - In Hilary Putnam (Contemporary Philosophy in Focus). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.